There's a difference between having control and having full control.
For instance, you don't have full control over fuel injection or ignition timing in your truck, but it doesn't mean you can't drive.
Likewise - in a stock coil-sprung Land Rover understeering is a built-in, inherent part of the vehicle. It doesn't mean you can't drive.
Traction control is an electronic built-in band-aid to allow incompetent drivers with bragging-rights horsepower and torque ratings to stay on the road, present in most vehicles on the market today.
Boeing's electronic intervention is an electronic band-aid to a diminished stability of the platform. It is also common as dirt everywhere in aircraft design. A B2 is fundamentally aerodynamically-unstable and can only be flown with super-fast and overwhelming computer control. So what?
The question (to me) is two-fold: (a) could Boeing's negative-feedback control to become positive-feedback under some conditions, natural or pilot-induced, and (b) how come it didn't happen in the U.S. but twice - in the market
allowing people to become commercial pilots in as little as 240 hours including simulator?