trying to do this in an easy to view format... let's use combined city/freeway/offroad for some consistancy.
Last edited:
ptschram said:I'm with Dave. At 219K miles, I know that my camshaft has more in common with a pushrod than a camshaft and I'm certain that's mainly what's responsible for my horribly poor fuel economy.
It's the cross we bear as Rover owners.
PT
ray96disco said:Since July, 2005, I have driven 18,000 miles, averaging 13.4 mpg combined hwy/city/offroad, with the majority of miles being the city category.
The top 10 reasons we keep them even though the mileage does suck:
10. It's paid for.
9. It's not unusual to have a Disco with high miles.
8. It's big enough to haul most of your tools and parts with you on the trail to keep it running (even if you do have to leave the wife and kids).
7. What owners of other makes can get an enthusiastic group together to help with repairs or upgrades?
6. Help is only a few keystrokes away (What other website can you search and get such good help or be chastised for not searching threads prior to asking questions that have been flogged to death?).
5. What D1 owner here doesn't have big plans for their vehicle?
4. It's more fun to drive than anything else in it's price range.
3. How many other vehicles are considerate enough to let you know they are out of fluids by not dirtying up your driveway any longer?
2. What other automaker uses such shitty seals on a steering box?
And the No. 1 reason to own a Discovery Series I with poor fuel economy is:
1. It's paid for!
Did I mention that it's paid for?
NVRover said:Has a bit of wear on it eh?