Screw the Sig and the Glock, just get one of these. Made by Arsenal. Available in a local Green Top for, oh a mere $5k or so.
Glock vs Sig
- Thread starter bigred
- Start date
Screw the Sig and the Glock, just get one of these. Made by Arsenal. Available in a local Green Top for, oh a mere $5k or so.
That's the Desert Eagle for movies this decade.
No kidding; as impractical as the DE. The slow-motion video on Arsenal's site is pretty cool though.
yes i understand everything breaks at some point, but it is two words to mean that they are tough. i also understand the precision part. everyone has an opinion and i have carried a few pistols over the years and have shot a little bit and for me i go with the glock. like i said before, go with what the op like as he is going to get a million different opinions. i just happen to be lucky enough to have seen many pistols and other guns for that matter proven or not in my world. cheers, c
atriot:
Twice as deadly comrade. Twice as deadly...
P.S. Like Boris (Snatch) said, "...weight is the sign of reliability..." "If it doesn't vork, you can always hit him with it."
It's no X300, but an X300 with Glock controls would be the amazing. They are far more sensible in operation, and easier to install and remove for cleaning.
The lights are fine from a quality point of view, but they don't have that Surefire punch. A flash from either in dim lighting conditions will identify a target and blind it, though.
Cheers,
Kennith
You're absolutely right.
Precision from the design itself is largely irrelevant. Most firearms will out-shoot most people at expected ranges, unless that weapon is defective. I'm no different.
Consider this: Every man-portable weapon in the military is a "used" weapon. They are scratched up, worn, and have seen thousands of rounds; well-maintained, but certainly not as precise as a brand new, carefully sculpted civilian model.
Professional or enthusiast target shooters are the only people that need to worry about that stuff. Everyone else just needs to find something that works for their own skeletal geometry and level of training. Beyond that, it's a matter of overall quality and desired features.
You're going to find more difference in chamber on one pistol than you will on pistols chambered for the same cartridge from two different quality manufacturers with the same barrel length and action.
Cheers,
Kennith
I bought the ones without the laser, as I don't much care for visible lasers, but I was able to find Fobus products that supported the units I had. I haven't looked lately, though. There may be more.
Cheers,
Kennith
Uggh. The new Bond movie is already defiled
Yeah, because that's so much worse than the idea of a break-down pistol made of gold...:rofl:
Cheers,
Kennith
Ok then, forget tupperware and go with a Beretta M9. Accurate, will eat anything you can feed it and when open carried it's big enough to say "leave me alone and go find a sheep".
I usually open carry an 8040 Mini Cougar, it's surprising how most people don't even notice it's there.
Now let's all get into the "element of surprise" from the cc only crowd.:smilelol:
Personally I do not see a point to open carry in public, especially having a ccw. Not sure what you mean by the "element of surprise," (if I have to draw a firearm it is not to surprise someone but rather mitigate a situation for which there is no other recourse) but why would one want to let others know he/she has a weapon on them? We are not exactly in a combat zone here. If someone intends to do something bad to you, exposed gun or not, they may still go for it. I would rather not broadcast to the world that I am armed; after all that is a tool of last resort and I want to keep it concealed until there is a need to use it. Train with it from concealment, so presentation is not an issue.
A very common misconception that a 9mm doesn't get the job done. It's been proven time and time again the current tech 9mm lugar round has plenty of stopping power.