Just ordered some tires... LOL

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
I'll point out that I'd have tried the Duratracs or Adventures, but they are pulling the same construction nonsense they did with the MTRKs.

While the tighter blocks on these other tires may mitigate the issue somewhat, it's not going to eliminate what I consider to be a design fault. I don't want to encourage that marketing bullshit.

Goodyear knows damned well what Kevlar is, and how it's best used. They are just banking on the idea that most people don't.

It sucks, because I really like that Adventure pattern. It's been around in one form or another for ages, and is absolutely proven in terrain the world over; even heavy mud when driven properly.

Cheers,

Kennith
 

Roving Beetle

Well-known member
I hate to say it.... But I swapped the GY DT tires off 265-75-16 and put 255-85-16 Maxxis Bighorns on and the Maxxis handle WAY better.

Kennith may be on to something. The taller narrow Maxxis feels far more planted to the road and more stable in corners.

I loved the DT as a snow winter tire - but so far the Maxxis feels better overall and will work better on anything except glare ice.

I have 265 studded snows on another set of wheels as winter daily driver tires.
 

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
I hate to say it.... But I swapped the GY DT tires off 265-75-16 and put 255-85-16 Maxxis Bighorns on and the Maxxis handle WAY better.

Kennith may be on to something. The taller narrow Maxxis feels far more planted to the road and more stable in corners.

I loved the DT as a snow winter tire - but so far the Maxxis feels better overall and will work better on anything except glare ice.

I have 265 studded snows on another set of wheels as winter daily driver tires.

I'll bet a cutaway diagram of that tire would illustrate three bead to bead plies within the carcass, or two with a high turn up under the cable. The obvious lack of filler, combined with reported improved handling, indicates a solid, traditionally wound tire.

Also of interest is the tread face to sidewall interface. It's deep. Now, a clam-shell mold is always going to crank out a deep tread section, but so will a fully segmented mold if you use the damned thing properly.

Goodyear not only decoupled the shoulders; they also left the interface right in the problem area. So, now you've got one sidewall speaking Chinese, the other speaking French, and a tread face that can only understand Swahili.

Using Kevlar only adds genuine insult to poor design. If the way they're using it made any sense at all in this universe, we'd all have carbon fiber rock sliders.:banghead:

Now, they could be forgiven on the MTR. They can claim it's a crawling tire and be done with it; but they didn't. Fuck it.

Pulling that shit on other tires, however, is asinine. They've got two more great tread patterns in there; in the Adventures and Duratracs, with a wonderful new compound, and to my mind will have ruined them with this bullshit.

Those tires may seem fine, but remember, most people buy tires when their others are shot, so anything seems like an improvement. They think they remember how the others were new, but they don't. Their driving style subtly changes before the smile fades, and nobody is the wiser.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that very few people will drop this kind of cash on something, and then turn right around and say it's dog shit. They won't admit such a mistake, and most of them won't have owned many tires, anyway.

...Then you've got your publications that claim to be authorities in the field, but they won't call any manufacturer on a foul.

You back from Ireland yet?

Cheers,

Kennith
 

Vic00Dis

Well-known member
Jul 20, 2014
56
0
Lakeland fl
Ok !! Raised Red Letter Generals seems like they should be fairly quiet. and all I want to do is play in the sand.. No Rocks or Mud for me..So anyway the Red letters should look great on my Black Truck....
 

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
I expect the Generals will likely be a bit more quiet; or at least drone at a more tolerable frequency. I'm certainly not expecting silence, here.

Sand is their purpose, so it's an obvious choice for your application. Given the tread depth and width of the voids, however, I'm looking forward to seeing how they do in the mud. I bet they won't suck nearly as bad as I predicted at first.

We'll see if I can even get them, though. The last time I tried, they were out of stock pretty much everywhere; even on the net, despite the lack of notifications.

I wish there was a decent tire shop around here. If there was, I'd give them some business, but they are all liars and scam artists of the first order. Sears was the next best thing.

EDIT: Apparently, they've shipped, and should arrive on Tuesday sometime.

Cheers,

Kennith
 
Last edited:

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
Here's a good point about the Goodyear MTR Kevlars:

They are absolutely wonderful in rain. I'd go so far as to say that this may well be one of the best rain tires I've ever run. There's that great tread compound I mentioned at work; as well as the pattern.

If you really look closely, you can see precisely why it's so good in those conditions, and why it would also make a great winter tire, as well as equal anything shy of an Interco in the mud.

This confirms my suspicion beyond reasonable doubt. The tread design itself is great, and so is the compound. It's the damned carcass that's the problem.

Cheers,

Kennith
 

cosmic88

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2010
436
0
Florida
Yo Kennith,

Can we get an update on these "Red Letters"? I need to buy tires this week and am strongly considering the 265/75r/16's.

I've had the AT2 Grabbers on mine (245/75) for a little over five years now and like them as a good overall choice.
 

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
Yo Kennith,

Can we get an update on these "Red Letters"? I need to buy tires this week and am strongly considering the 265/75r/16's.

I've had the AT2 Grabbers on mine (245/75) for a little over five years now and like them as a good overall choice.

I really like them in most conditions. They are fine in rain, light mud, dirt, sand, and certainly on the road. They damned sure enough corner majestically.

Ice is a no-go for most people, and slushy roads aren't too much fun. If you're good, you can mange them, but you'll feel it. Conventional MT tires are better in those conditions, and obviously an AT would be superior.

I would avoid driving too close to any other vehicle wearing these tires on icy or snowy roads.:rofl:

On proper snow and ice off-pavement, however, they are just as good as anything else. That's not really very surprising. They won't bury you. That's a bit like deep South-Eastern mud, though; everything sucks equally until you move to a dedicated, purpose-built tire that's rubbish everywhere else.

It's pretty much just the road that kills these in the winter.

They aren't all-season tires, and I wouldn't call them properly all-terrain, either. It's hard not to love them, though, for their road, sand, and dirt performance.

If you spend, say, more than two weeks a year in snow and ice, live in mountainous terrain (any snow or ice on switch-backs could be incredibly dangerous), or most of your play time is in really nasty mud, I'd say go for a different tire. There are far better choices.

If you want a tough as nails, well-made tire that gets it's rocks off in every other environment, though, these are going to be hard to beat; and if you spend a lot of time at the beach, they are certainly the obvious choice.

These things are built like tanks, and weigh about as much. If durability is a concern, there are only a few other tires that have this level of solidity. They will sap a bit of power, though, and you might see a slight mileage hit.

So far as your drive-line is concerned, you'll have to consider these a couple of sizes up, simply due to their mass. They run true to size, but that weight is not a small factor. It's the penalty for the properly constructed three ply carcass, though. There's no way around that.

Those who drive their Rovers regularly on long trips or even around town will really get a kick out of them. They are tight at speed, and as I've noted, handle very well. They aren't quiet, but the noise is different than anything else I've run, and it doesn't bother me.

It's hard to say what they'll be like in that snotty mud that turns most tires into racing slicks, but I don't expect great performance. I haven't had a chance to get them out in such places, because I've been building the miles for a while until I'm sure nothing else is going to break after this thing sat for so long.

They won't be mud tires, though, but neither are half the mud tires on the market.

You've just got to sit down and really think about what you do with your vehicle to determine what you need out of a tire. If you do most of your wheeling over a few weekends a year, and end up in hundreds of feet of nasty mud every time, or lots of snow and ice, the performance in other environments won't matter. You won't be having fun when you really want to.

That's all I can really offer at the moment. I haven't had a chance to get a complete picture of their capabilities. Maybe this DII has just enough juice left in it to get them in some slop after all this ice and rain.

If I can, I'll see what it takes to confuse them. I just have to think of a place nearby in which it's okay to churn up the ground. I've got places to go, but they are farther away than I want to drive the vehicle in it's current condition.

In 265/75R16 they are cheap for some reason, so it's not an end of the world event if you don't like them. They would also be easy to sell. I get offers every now and again, and I've never had that before.

Also note that those red letters are eventually going to come off. They put a lot of effort into figuring out how to get them to stay on there, but there's no way it's going to be permanent. General just wanted to do something cool with that, because racing tires look fun. There is a reason nobody else does that, though.

That said, until you get into stupid sizes, these are actually the same tires they race. There's no difference at all, which is kind of fun to think about on the road, and gives you a picture of the solidity you bought.

Get these buggers in the rocks, though, and a nice side-wall scrape may well tear them off.

One more thing:

It should be noted, if you aren't already aware, that my off-pavement priorities involve avoiding becoming stuck at nearly any cost, and closing distances as quickly as reasonably possible. I will thus avoid any terrain I can that will make becoming stuck overly likely. My vehicle is out-classed by those who spend lots of fun-time on trails.

That being the case, keep in mind my perspective. What I find acceptable and what others find acceptable can be two very different things. I may concern myself with attention to detail, but I might not consider noting certain things. I know the technology, but not all of it is important enough to me to remember it might be important to others.

I'll test them in nasty stuff as soon as I can. I'll try to do it this week, but the vehicle might not cooperate.

Cheers,

Kennith
 

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
Kenneth, can you explain in a little more detail how you feel about your tires?

Just trying to be as helpful as I can. People don't go into enough detail about tire experiences, which leads to confusion when searching threads. It's frustrating.

If just one of my points manages to directly answer a question for someone, it was worth the keyboard wear.

Cheers,

Kennith
 

sloanfiske

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2005
141
0
Yo Kennith,

Can we get an update on these "Red Letters"? I need to buy tires this week and am strongly considering the 265/75r/16's.

I've had the AT2 Grabbers on mine (245/75) for a little over five years now and like them as a good overall choice.

GY Duratrac. Just sayin'
 

cosmic88

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2010
436
0
Florida
........ it was worth the keyboard wear.

Cheers,

Kennith

This makes me wonder how many keyboards you have gone through in the past few years.

Thanks for the detailed summary. I used to have the 265's so the rear quarters are already "cut" accordingly.

At $170 ish ea. these are hard to pass on.
 

Blue

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2004
10,056
869
AZ
I just put on a set of Cooper Discoverer STT in 285/75/16. So far they seem to be a good tire, only done about 1,000 miles on them with maybe 150 or so offroad.
 

mgreenspan

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2005
4,723
130
Briggs's Back Yard
Well this is an unrelated post but I'm going to throw it out there since it's about general tires. I bought another set of General Grabber HTS for the GX in 265/65R17. Again, just like the set one of my old Discos, these tires are the most quiet tires for an SUV I have ever owned. Unreal compared to the Michelins that were on it before and they handle great in rain and ride really nicely.

Next Jimmy will post how they suck in snow.
 

bri

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
6,183
153
US
Just trying to be as helpful as I can. People don't go into enough detail about tire experiences, which leads to confusion when searching threads. It's frustrating.

If just one of my points manages to directly answer a question for someone, it was worth the keyboard wear.

Cheers,

Kennith

That's all it took to wear a Ducky keyboard? Were you pounding past the 105g force limit if the switch or what?