Scangauge II, impressions from MY point of view

[MNinWI]

I am glad Scangauge II worked for all of you. I bought one in 2008. It occasionally locked up. They sent another one, same problems. No hassle return.

In 2010 I got an Ultra Gauge. It had problems too, I returned it. They reprogrammed it and they told me that they added some programing for it to work in my vehicle. It has worked trouble free ever since and I am very happy with it. My vehicle uses about 5 or 6 percent more fuel than the default settings, was easy to calibrate.

2003 DII is the only vehicle I have tried either one in.

 

[jafir]

I am glad Scangauge II worked for all of you. I bought one in 2008. It occasionally locked up. They sent another one, same problems. No hassle return.

In 2010 I got an Ultra Gauge. It had problems too, I returned it. They reprogrammed it and they told me that they added some programing for it to work in my vehicle. It has worked trouble free ever since and I am very happy with it. My vehicle uses about 5 or 6 percent more fuel than the default settings, was easy to calibrate.

2003 DII is the only vehicle I have tried either one in.

I've got an Ultra Gauge too... mainly because I didn't have an OBD2 scanner that wasn't Land Rover specific. I like the size and the number of items I can put on the main screen, so I still use it on my D2 even though I've got a nanocom.... and I can use it to check and clear codes on my Honda too, if needed.

 

[hafaday]

I have both (ScanGauge and Ultra Gauge). I prefer the Ultra Gauge to the ScanGauge, but that's me.

I don't want to go in to details and F-up Kennith's thread on the SG2.