The Revival of Authoritarianism

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Don't confuse where the excitement lies, with you being wrong, again.

Flynn may have told a small lie, now lets compare that to Eric Holder was held in criminal and civil contempt. I just pick my battles. That mindset comes with age.
A "small lie." Good to know that he didn't have any Russian connections, or tried to set up secret back channels for Trump. Or that he took Turkish money while working for Trump and failing to disclose that.

But, hey...sure throw Eric Holder out there. Why? Who knows what that has to do with Flynn. Answer: Nothing.

(Oh, and that "civil and criminal" contempt was a resolution passed by a vote by the House (a largely Republican one). Not an actual judicial hearing or setting or a prosecution. But nice try)
 

gimebakmybulits

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2013
898
46
Pasadena
A "small lie." Good to know that he didn't have any Russian connections, or tried to set up secret back channels for Trump. Or that he took Turkish money while working for Trump and failing to disclose that.

But, hey...sure throw Eric Holder out there. Why? Who knows what that has to do with Flynn. Answer: Nothing.

(Oh, and that "civil and criminal" contempt was a resolution passed by a vote by the House (a largely Republican one). Not an actual judicial hearing or setting or a prosecution. But nice try)
How any living creature be as fucking dumb as you and still be alive is worthy of a National Geographic special.
 

brian4d

Well-known member
Dec 3, 2007
6,247
40
High Point, NC
A "small lie." Good to know that he didn't have any Russian connections, or tried to set up secret back channels for Trump. Or that he took Turkish money while working for Trump and failing to disclose that.

But, hey...sure throw Eric Holder out there. Why? Who knows what that has to do with Flynn. Answer: Nothing.

(Oh, and that "civil and criminal" contempt was a resolution passed by a vote by the House (a largely Republican one). Not an actual judicial hearing or setting or a prosecution. But nice try)
Are you retarded?

How does eric holder have to do with anything. HINT: HE WAS OUR AG AND WAS HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS. Meaning, that's a little more than lying to congress. Sense my sarcasm tard boy? What does the majority have to do with anything? There's always a majority.

Setup secret 'back channels' for Trump? Ohhhhhh, this just keeps getting better and better. You wouldn't dare spew this shit in person over a beer. The whole establishment would be laughing at you.
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Setup secret 'back channels' for Trump? Ohhhhhh, this just keeps getting better and better. You wouldn't dare spew this shit in person over a beer. The whole establishment would be laughing at you.
You really are allergic to facts aren't you?

Or I guess Jared is lying? Or is this just fake news?

Jared Kushner gave a confusing explanation for his alleged 'back channel' plan with Russia
President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, denied in a statement Monday that he suggested setting up a "back channel" communication line to the Kremlin that would bypass US intelligence agencies and persist after Trump was inaugurated.

But Kushner acknowledged in the statement, which came ahead of a closed-door appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee, that he asked Russia's ambassador to the US in December whether the Trump transition team could use Russia's embassy to communicate privately with Moscow about Syria.

The meeting with the ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, "occurred in Trump Tower, where we had our transition office, and lasted twenty [to] thirty minutes," Kushner wrote in an 11-page statement detailing his contacts with Russian nationals during the election and transition period.

"Lt. General Michael Flynn (Ret.), who became the President's National Security Advisor, also attended ... I stated our desire for a fresh start in relations."

Kushner said Kislyak, whose tenure in the US ended this past weekend, asked whether there was "a secure line in the transition office to conduct a conversation" about the US's Syria policy.

"General Flynn or I explained that there were no such lines," Kushner wrote. But he said he went on to ask whether the Russian Embassy "had an existing communications channel ... we could use where they would be comfortable transmitting the information they wanted to relay to General Flynn."
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
How does eric holder have to do with anything. HINT: HE WAS OUR AG AND WAS HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS. Meaning, that's a little more than lying to congress. Sense my sarcasm tard boy? What does the majority have to do with anything? There's always a majority.
You know Trump was also held in contempt of Congress, right? That thing called impeachment.
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Straight from the Mueller Report:

In the meantime, although he had already formed the impression that Kislyak was not necessarily the right point of contact,1138 Kushner went forward with the meeting that Kislyak had requested on November 16. It took place at Trump Tower on November 30, 2016.1139 At Kushner’s invitation, Flynn also attended; Bannon was invited but did not attend.1140 During the meeting, which lasted approximately 30 minutes, Kushner expressed a desire on the part of the incoming Administration to start afresh with U.S.-Russian relations.1141 Kushner also asked Kislyak to identify the best person (whether Kislyak or someone else) with whom to direct future discussions—someone who had contact with Putin and the ability to speak for him.1142 The three men also discussed U.S. policy toward Syria, and Kislyak floated the idea of having Russian generals brief the Transition Team on the topic using a secure communications line.1143 After Flynn explained that there was no secure line in the Transition Team offices, Kushner asked Kislyak if they could communicate using secure facilities at the Russian Embassy. Kislyak quickly rejected that idea.
 

gimebakmybulits

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2013
898
46
Pasadena
You really are allergic to facts aren't you?

Or I guess Jared is lying? Or is this just fake news?

Jared Kushner gave a confusing explanation for his alleged 'back channel' plan with Russia
President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, denied in a statement Monday that he suggested setting up a "back channel" communication line to the Kremlin that would bypass US intelligence agencies and persist after Trump was inaugurated.

But Kushner acknowledged in the statement, which came ahead of a closed-door appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee, that he asked Russia's ambassador to the US in December whether the Trump transition team could use Russia's embassy to communicate privately with Moscow about Syria.

The meeting with the ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, "occurred in Trump Tower, where we had our transition office, and lasted twenty [to] thirty minutes," Kushner wrote in an 11-page statement detailing his contacts with Russian nationals during the election and transition period.

"Lt. General Michael Flynn (Ret.), who became the President's National Security Advisor, also attended ... I stated our desire for a fresh start in relations."

Kushner said Kislyak, whose tenure in the US ended this past weekend, asked whether there was "a secure line in the transition office to conduct a conversation" about the US's Syria policy.

"General Flynn or I explained that there were no such lines," Kushner wrote. But he said he went on to ask whether the Russian Embassy "had an existing communications channel ... we could use where they would be comfortable transmitting the information they wanted to relay to General Flynn."
Why do you try so hard? We get it....
 

brian4d

Well-known member
Dec 3, 2007
6,247
40
High Point, NC
Straight from the Mueller Report:

In the meantime, although he had already formed the impression that Kislyak was not necessarily the right point of contact,1138 Kushner went forward with the meeting that Kislyak had requested on November 16. It took place at Trump Tower on November 30, 2016.1139 At Kushner’s invitation, Flynn also attended; Bannon was invited but did not attend.1140 During the meeting, which lasted approximately 30 minutes, Kushner expressed a desire on the part of the incoming Administration to start afresh with U.S.-Russian relations.1141 Kushner also asked Kislyak to identify the best person (whether Kislyak or someone else) with whom to direct future discussions—someone who had contact with Putin and the ability to speak for him.1142 The three men also discussed U.S. policy toward Syria, and Kislyak floated the idea of having Russian generals brief the Transition Team on the topic using a secure communications line.1143 After Flynn explained that there was no secure line in the Transition Team offices, Kushner asked Kislyak if they could communicate using secure facilities at the Russian Embassy. Kislyak quickly rejected that idea.

Damn boy let it go! Page two. Cliff notes:

the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

So fuck all your other little feelings.
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Damn boy let it go! Page two. Cliff notes:

the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

So fuck all your other little feelings.
Damn boy learn the facts!

The meeting was AFTER the election, so...nothing to do with election interference. Flynn still lied about the meeting - which was a violation of the Logan Act.
 

brian4d

Well-known member
Dec 3, 2007
6,247
40
High Point, NC
Damn boy learn the facts!

The meeting was AFTER the election, so...nothing to do with election interference. Flynn still lied about the meeting - which was a violation of the Logan Act.
Oh, Like what John Kerry did with Iran, got it!

The Logan act, an 18th century law that's never been used to prosecute anyone. Next!
 

fishEH

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2009
6,628
92
Lake Villa, IL
Scott's obsession is proof of Trump's winning. The sheer amount of time you've wasted spewing your "facts" and linking to ridiculous articles is proof of your losing.
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Scott's obsession is proof of Trump's winning. The sheer amount of time you've wasted spewing your "facts" and linking to ridiculous articles is proof of your losing.
No, your reply is the proof that Trump is winning: Facts, in those "ridiculous articles," are ignored by you and the other Trump supporters.
 

brian4d

Well-known member
Dec 3, 2007
6,247
40
High Point, NC
No, your reply is the proof that Trump is winning: Facts, in those "ridiculous articles," are ignored by you and the other Trump supporters.
4 MORE YEARS, 4 MORE YEARS! USA USA USA!

We've already proven your won't listen to interviews of people the WAPO says are bad and you claim to read centrist articles which are left leaning AT BEST. this is what you ingest Scott. You're full of shit and your knowledge base is limited and single sided. You bring nothing to the party. And worst of all, you don't even realize it cause you can't get past Trump. He won, he's living in your head, rent free. Bravo.
 

gimebakmybulits

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2013
898
46
Pasadena
Damn boy learn the facts!

The meeting was AFTER the election, so...nothing to do with election interference. Flynn still lied about the meeting - which was a violation of the Logan Act.
You are a dumb fucking cunt. Go do some fucking research on Flynn and what actually happened, not what WaPo wants you to think. Pull your shit covered head out of your ass and wake the fuck up, otherwise go find Wemple and you two ass clowns can circle jerk each other to death.
 

SGaynor

Well-known member
Callsign: KN4KFS
Dec 6, 2006
6,943
133
48
Bristol, TN
Are you retarded?

How does eric holder have to do with anything. HINT: HE WAS OUR AG AND WAS HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS. Meaning, that's a little more than lying to congress. Sense my sarcasm tard boy? What does the majority have to do with anything? There's always a majority.

Setup secret 'back channels' for Trump? Ohhhhhh, this just keeps getting better and better. You wouldn't dare spew this shit in person over a beer. The whole establishment would be laughing at you.
Oh, BTW....
Are you hating on Barr too? He was held in criminal contempt of Congress.
Or are you going to dismiss it because he’s on your team?

Don’t worry. We know you’ll explain this away as just the Dems being political. The Repubs would never do such a thing.

#hypocrite

 

gimebakmybulits

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2013
898
46
Pasadena
Oh, BTW....
Are you hating on Barr too? He was held in criminal contempt of Congress.
Or are you going to dismiss it because he’s on your team?

Don’t worry. We know you’ll explain this away as just the Dems being political. The Repubs would never do such a thing.

#hypocrite
Damn Tard boy, blew a load reading that one didn't you.... You are beyond fucking retarded... If you had half a brain cell you'd actually be able to see what your party is doing.... but no, you blew em all away with massive amounts of ayml nitrate (wasn't the only thing you blew) in your chickenhawk days.
#justtoostupid #alsoafuckingretard #stillafucktard #justgoaway #6
 
  • Like
Reactions: brian4d