RTE upper mounts(stock lower mounts) ... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2003 Archives - Discovery Technical » Archive through May 18, 2003 » RTE upper mounts(stock lower mounts) 2" lift...what shocks?...NOT rancho!!! « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 7
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 - 10:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Hey guys, here's the deal:

I have RTE drop cones and 2" springs...
been through 2 sets of RS9000 (9234 to be exact) in the last year...
I was told that this is a good, long travel shock that works with RTE upper shock mount relocation mount...when you don't change the lower mount..

It's also the shock that's used on Ford F150 pickups 97-01. You should see the lying I had to do to get replacements!!!

I keep blowing this shock out!!!
Not heavy duty enough (I guess) for a loaded Disco...that tows heavy loads with lots of toungue wieght!

Someone suggested the Pro-Comp es 3000
as a good middle of the road shock that's used on a lot of lifted rovers??

Which model though??!!!

You'd think...Ford F150...right?
BUT...I think it should be for a 250 or 1 ton P'up? Just for the duty level...

I don't know what to do...

I need a long travel shock (and part #) that will let the springs drop on a 2" lifted disco...using RTE upper mounts.

Slider
 

Chris Marcel (Gumarcel)
Senior Member
Username: Gumarcel

Post Number: 388
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 - 11:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have never had ranchos, but i have heard they are pretty crappy. You could try bilstein shocks, i have heard good things about them. I haven't heard anything about procomp either.
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 10
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 - 11:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I need part numbers here on what works...
I know many of you have the same set up!
 

Greg Hirst (Gregh)
Member
Username: Gregh

Post Number: 186
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 - 11:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Go with Bilsteins or OME's. You won't be sorry.

Some others have had good results with Black Diamond XT's but I have no experience with them. I don't even know if Warn makes them for your application.
 

Chris Marcel (Gumarcel)
Senior Member
Username: Gumarcel

Post Number: 389
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 12:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I would vote for OME, i have the rovertym 2" wiht OME HD all around, its great, just a thought
 

James (Jimmyg)
Senior Member
Username: Jimmyg

Post Number: 268
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 02:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

OME won't allow the correct articulation (with the shocks you all speak of) with cones.
 

James (Jimmyg)
Senior Member
Username: Jimmyg

Post Number: 271
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 03:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I had good luck with Rancho 9234's and Slider...You will not be running a long travel shock with 2-3 inces of lift. Long travel in my mind is 12 inch at least.
 

Nadim Samara (Discodino)
Member
Username: Discodino

Post Number: 54
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 03:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

go OME N76 in the rear. soft, but great!
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 11
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 08:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

the 9234's have 10.875" of travel...
16.125 compressed length
27" extended

I need to match this...so my drop cones drop, but not too much either.

Does he OME have this travel and roughly these dimensions?

 

Mike Rupp (Mike_rupp)
Member
Username: Mike_rupp

Post Number: 188
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 09:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Slider,

I went through the same thing. Here's my old setup: 2" springs, RTE upper mounts, cones, 9234s. I blew out 2 sets of 9234s in the last 10K miles. I noticed that when I took the shocks off, the stud mounts were bent slightly. Since the RTE mounts are moved forward also, the bottom mounts on the axle are no longer perpendicular to the top mount. This can't be a good thing. This isn't an issue with the RTE 3" lift since the bottom mounts are eye mounts and allow the shock to rotate. My brother has had the 3" RTE lift for about 25K miles and no problems witht the rear Ranchos.

Here's a comparison of the N76 and 9234:
Compressed Extended Travel
OME N76 Rear 16.06 26.97 10.91
Rancho 9234 16.25 27.25 11.00

They should fit in place pretty well using the same setup, but keep in mind that the N76 uses an eyelet mount on the bottom which will require a new mount and might change the dimensions.
 

Neil Flanagan (Electriceel)
Member
Username: Electriceel

Post Number: 109
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 11:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

You are running the 9234's upside down. Running the shock upside down interferes with the valving at the end of the shock regardless of what Rancho says. Its simple hydrodynamics. They will work ok but flip them back over and they will work much better.
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 14
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 07:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

mike rupp...

finally, someone who knows what I'm talking about!
What makes the 3" lift different at the axle end??
A new shock mount?...IS that a cut and re-weld job?

Neil
Are you sure I'm running them upside down???
Hydrodynamics sound right...But why would Rancho put the valving knob on the axle end?

currently the valve knob is at the top (chassis side) of the shock...you think this is wrong?
 

Mike Bauer (Mikeb)
New Member
Username: Mikeb

Post Number: 27
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 09:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Slider:

I too have the 9324's with a 2" RoverTym Lift with the RTE drop cones. My shocks are bad too. Hopefully someone will have a viable suggestion for to this problem. I really like the long travel of the 9234's.

Thanks,
Mike B.
 

Neil Flanagan (Electriceel)
Member
Username: Electriceel

Post Number: 116
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 10:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Yep. I'm sure. On the RS9234, the eye is the bottom and the stud is the top, same as the F150's they are made for.

I ran the RTE upper mounts with the RS9234 for a while on the Disco...until they self destruct.

Boing boing boing...then the next thing you know is your rear tires are sitting in puddles of HTE oil.

Rancho will replace them for free.
 

Neil Flanagan (Electriceel)
Member
Username: Electriceel

Post Number: 117
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 10:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

"Hopefully someone will have a viable suggestion for to this problem."

I think John already has a mount to flip them. give him a call.
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 15
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 10:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Rancho will replace them?...thier laws say no warrenty on lifted trucks....and thier distibutors suck...
this is the third time!!
I had to lie and say they were going on the Ford 1st and 2nd time...

only to find out...

Advance Auto Parts (my distributor) says they will only replace them once?!!

sound right?
 

Chris Marcel (Gumarcel)
Senior Member
Username: Gumarcel

Post Number: 390
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 10:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

don't ranchos have a lifetime warrenty?
 

Eddie (Honu)
Member
Username: Honu

Post Number: 116
Registered: 01-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 15, 2003 - 10:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

slider you do have your rear shocks mounted upside down. send your shocks directly to rancho if the shop hassles you to much. there not losing anything, you can send them back yourself. just a phone call to them all that is needed.
 

Shaun Power (Shaunp)
New Member
Username: Shaunp

Post Number: 14
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Friday, May 16, 2003 - 04:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Heaps of people here in Australia have broken Ranchos and as a result they have a bad name here. The dealers here seem to replace them ok but you just break them again. Most people seem happy with OME and Koni. The OME units are soft because they are single acting, this is to allow less resistance to articulation.
 

Chris Marcel (Gumarcel)
Senior Member
Username: Gumarcel

Post Number: 391
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Friday, May 16, 2003 - 07:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

http://www.discoweb.org/thewindow/rancho.jpg Is that the problem?
 

slider (Slider)
New Member
Username: Slider

Post Number: 17
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Friday, May 16, 2003 - 09:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

no...that's not the problem...
it's an internal thing...the fluid / piston inside has lost all resistance!

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration