Range Rover P38 Lift Completed Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2003 Archives - Range Rover- Technical » Archive through September 30, 2003 » Range Rover P38 Lift Completed « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Alan Bates (Alanb)
Senior Member
Username: Alanb

Post Number: 305
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 09:55 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

For those interested or thinking about lifting a P38 Range Rover, here is what I have done:

96 RR with motorcarsltd EAS to coil spring conversion kit installed. Replaced front springs with OME 761 PS springs and rear with OME 781 PS springs. Resulting lift was 2.75� in front over stock and 3.5� in rear. Please note that the stock springs are much shorter than D1 or RRC springs, that�s why I got so much lift. I added 15mm of trim packers to bring the front up a little, total lift: Front 3.35�, rear 3.5�, the RR sits about 3/4" taller in the rear (measured from center of wheel to top of wheel opening arch). Being a cheap **** I kept the Bilstein shocks. For the front shock, I installed a 3� square steel tube to raise the front bottom shock mount up 3� and used JKS #3100 sway bar quick disconnects for a Jeep GC, I have got back all my down travel with this setup. The brakelines are pretty close to fully extended under full drop. I have not messed with the rear shocks yet, so the limiting factor in the back is the shocks, have to look into getting longer shocks.

I put on BFG MT/KM 265/75/16�s with no rubbing problems anywhere and a ton of room to spare, I did have to remove the front mudflap, it would rub under certain conditions.

The ride is excellent, as good and if not better than the stock air springs, nice firm ride without any harshness, corners well too considering the lift and tires. Absolutely no vibes at any speed, tracks very good, but not as good as stock, but most people won�t notice the difference. Lost a little bit of pickup speed, but not a big difference, they�re all slow anyway. All in all, very happy with the outcome, but still need to do something about the rear shocks and eventually the front. Have not had a chance to put it to the off-road test yet, but will be able to next week in Colorado.

For high res pics open my P38lift folder:

http://f1.pg.briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/[email protected]/lst?&.dir=/p38lift&.src=bc&.view=l

stock

lift

coil1

coil2
 

Randall Smith (Mr_smith)
Member
Username: Mr_smith

Post Number: 62
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 05:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I'm really digging your shock mount in the lower photo. Could be made stronger(if needded) by welding a plate onto one opening of that square tube. I have 1.5" extentions on my front shocks.

Randall
 

Bill Collett (Bcollett)
New Member
Username: Bcollett

Post Number: 17
Registered: 07-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 05:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

What is the largest tire you can go to witout doing a lift or the spring conversion?
 

Blue (Blue)
Dweb Lounge Member
Username: Blue

Post Number: 442
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 07:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

damn, lookin good!
 

Rob Davison (Nosivad_bor)
Dweb Lounge Member
Username: Nosivad_bor

Post Number: 894
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 07:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

very tight, i like it a lot

have me thinking p38 range rover next year instead of Classic 1995 LWB

-rob
 

Blue (Blue)
Dweb Lounge Member
Username: Blue

Post Number: 445
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 07:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

yeah, it has that "stock with an attitude" look to it. Very stealth, very nice.
 

Phillip Perkinson (Rover4x4)
Senior Member
Username: Rover4x4

Post Number: 440
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 08:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

man that looks excellent. best looking thing I have seen al day
 

Alan Bates (Alanb)
Senior Member
Username: Alanb

Post Number: 306
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 08:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Thanks for all the positive comments, we'll see how this sucker works in the Colorado mountains next week, hopefully it works well. The prices of these early P38 Rovers are great and dropping everyday, I set a goal to make this one a good daily driver as well as a decent off-roader but nothing too radical.

Bill, check here for the largest tire on a stock P38:

http://www.rangerovers.net/rrtires.htm#mkii

Randall, the tube is 3/16" steel so hopefully I shouldn't have any problems.

 

Bill Bettridge (Billb)
Dweb Lounge Member
Username: Billb

Post Number: 1036
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 08:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Looks really good - glad to see someone modding the P38's - you'll probably be the trendsetter - LOL

Bill
 

Rhett Krulla (Retro78)
Member
Username: Retro78

Post Number: 43
Registered: 04-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 10:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Alan,

Brilliant Job! I should really consider those spacers for the front of mine. It does look a little odd with the rear so much taller. I love the look of the BFG/MT's as well. I have 265/70/16 whihc are ab out 1" smaller and wish I had gone up to the bigger tire. I am thinking about some black nato style rims with the 265/75's next spring for my trail rides. Again, great job!
 

Alan Bates (Alanb)
Senior Member
Username: Alanb

Post Number: 307
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 - 11:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Rhett,

I had no idea what kind of lift I would get when I first put on the OME springs. It sat about 1.25"-1.5" taller in the rear and it started to bother me, so I added the trim packers and now it is about 3/4" taller in the rear, which I can live with. In hindsight I maybe should have tried the 751's in the front, but not sure if that would make any difference, plus the ride would be harsher. Could possibly put 764's in, but that may have given too much lift.

Black steelies with some mudders would look great on your rover.
 

han chung (Hanchung)
Member
Username: Hanchung

Post Number: 89
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 10, 2003 - 11:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

alan,

I think your set up is awesome. The roof rack, FF hellas, lift, 265/75's on the alloys very nice combo. For some reason, the 265/75's on alloys combo is the best tire/wheel combo by far for either Disco II and the P38's.
Although the limitation in tire size doesn't stop there, any bigger sizes and steel wheel look like shit. In function and aesthetic purposes your choice is definately the smartest choice.
Also the fact that you didn�t hack your front bumper half way and only trimmed the bottom lip, that�s nice too.

Some owners have tried lifting their P38s by modifying their air suspension and using inappropriate components to achieve useless goals and the result is crap. Whatever they�v done might work, but still look like crap. Nice and clean OME conversion is the way to go.
The only thing though about your set up� that square tube/shock extension� I have never used any shock extensions before, but never hear great thing about it either. Besides, your P38 has an awesome traction control system so to risk damage over few inches of wheel travel� I would mount the shocks to it�s original place.

So far, the P38 looked best stock, now your OME lift shows that the P38 can look good as well by �kickin it up a notch�� LOL


 

Alan Bates (Alanb)
Senior Member
Username: Alanb

Post Number: 309
Registered: 07-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 10, 2003 - 12:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Thanks Han,

I'm gonna see how the shock mount extensions work out. If I bust or damage the shock, it will give me a good reason to replace it with a longer shock. The hard part will be finding a shock that will work with this lift.
 

A. Ali (Alia176)
Member
Username: Alia176

Post Number: 106
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Friday, September 12, 2003 - 09:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Alan,

Good job. It's nice to see someone using their noggin instead of their wallet when it comes to simple mods. I think your shock extension square tubing will compress under load due to the fact that Bilsteins are under such high pressure. Like Randall said, close up one of the openings with a flat steel of say 3/16". Nicely done indeed.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration