Geolander AT's Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2003 Archives - Discovery Technical » Archive through November 19, 2003 » Geolander AT's « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Trevor (Daredvl)
Member
Username: Daredvl

Post Number: 96
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Sunday, November 09, 2003 - 12:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Looking at putting a cheap set on. The stock Land Rover size only comes in a P235/70R16 and not an LT235/70R16.

Whats wrong with using a P instead of an LT?

Someone said not to in a previous post but didn't elaborate.

Anyone else using the Geolander AT's in the stock P235 size?

Thanks


(And yes my Disco is just a boulevard queen)
 

Lewis Jones (Cutter)
Member
Username: Cutter

Post Number: 50
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, November 09, 2003 - 11:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

P~passenger
LT~light truck
the LT's usually have a higher load rating, stronger sidewalls
the P's have weaker sidewalls and ride better on the street
For a heavy rig (and Disco's are heavy) I would, and do, go for the stronger sidewall.
Having said that, I see the Geo's on the trail often. I don't think I've seen 'em on a Disco, but I have seen them on Jeep XJ's and JZ's. They work pretty good around here.
 

Andrew Maier (Newman)
Senior Member
Username: Newman

Post Number: 373
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Sunday, November 09, 2003 - 02:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have the "P" Yoko's in 235/70R16 mainly because:

(1) I changed my mind from getting bigger and trimming at the last minute; and
(2) I screwed up my order and Tire Rack didn't want to take 'em back without me paying shipping.

I love them so far (approx 6000 miles)

They're plenty grippy and I haven't had any issues with the sidewalls -- I do offroad and you just need to be careful (which is a good plan anyway).


Andy
 

p (Pfb)
Member
Username: Pfb

Post Number: 71
Registered: 08-2003
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 01:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have the Geolander AT+ II in 245/75-15 in LT...

Perhaps it's worth doing the minor rear fender trim and adjusting the steering stops to go with these?

To answer your question, though:

P rated tires have a lower "load" rating, and typically a much softer, squirmier sidewall than an LT tire. As top-heavy, wander prone, and understeering as the Disco's are, I would recommend against a P rated tire.
 

Leo (Leo_hallak)
Member
Username: Leo_hallak

Post Number: 139
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 01:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have those with a 2inch Old Man lift, and to get full articulation in the back you have to trim the fenders, you may be able to get by with pushing the fenders out but it would be close. I also had to adjust front stearing stops.

-leo

My mistake- I am running the 235/85/16 versions. and before you find it out the hard way these tires are crap in the mud, fine on road and dry conditions.
 

Trevor (Daredvl)
Member
Username: Daredvl

Post Number: 97
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 08:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Doh. I already bought them too :-(

I hope they are ok. They feel great, I have no more pull or wandering, so I obviously had a bad Michelin before. It says the load rating is 104 which is like 1958? pounds per tire?

Is that not enough?
 

Trevor (Daredvl)
Member
Username: Daredvl

Post Number: 98
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 08:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Andrew, what PSi do you run yours at?
 

Andrew Maier (Newman)
Senior Member
Username: Newman

Post Number: 384
Registered: 04-2003
Posted on Monday, November 10, 2003 - 11:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

35 for all 4.
 

Victor Biro (Vabiro)
New Member
Username: Vabiro

Post Number: 4
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 - 02:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I just put the 235/70-16 Geolander on my 98 stock disco and immediately hit the trails.

The trail I was on was a mixture of rock and light mud, and it was a rainy fall day, so lots of slipery leaves on the ground and on the rocks.

Perfomance was significantly better than my Michelins; through light mud and wet rocks I had little or no wheel spin. Other Discos with me that had Goodyear MT/R and BFG MT were actually having some problems on the wet rock.

Then again, through thick clay mud I think I would have been the one in trouble and the MT/R owners would have been pulling me out. But I guess that's why they're called "Mud Terrain" tires.
 

Trevor (Daredvl)
Member
Username: Daredvl

Post Number: 100
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 - 08:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I noticed the load rating is only one load lower than the stock Michelins.
The Geolanders are 104, and the Michelins are 105.
Thats what about 70 pounds?
I'll keep my fingers crossed, they feel great on the roads. But of course my Michelins had a serious radial tire pull problem.
 

Tony DiFranco (Nhrover)
Member
Username: Nhrover

Post Number: 95
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 13, 2003 - 07:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

i HAVE THEM AND LOVE THEM! They are a great tire. GO with the LT. For reasons stated above its well worth the extra$$.
tony D

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration