RoverTym Radius Arms Offset Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2004 Archives - Discovery Technical » Archive through January 08, 2004 » RoverTym Radius Arms Offset « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Mark (Roverwrecks)
New Member
Username: Roverwrecks

Post Number: 19
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2004 - 05:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I've read a few threads about a shimmy after installig these. I have an XD that I am going to Run with HD OldMan EMU springs, most like a RoverTim Front bumper with a Husky 10K winch, oh yeah some sort of moderately aggressive all terrain tyres a little over stock in size. In thinking and the engineering, I don't see why a shimmy would occur.
 

Perry Ray Miller (Discojunky)
Member
Username: Discojunky

Post Number: 41
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2004 - 07:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

After installing a 3" lift on my Disco I tried to save money and leave off the radius corrections arms and trust me it was REAL steering sensitive. I had stock tires and no equipment and again I could not live with the handling. I put on 33" tires and that helped. I also put a front bumper and 1200lbs winch and this to helped. Sliders helped etc... The more wieght you get up front and the bigger the tires are the more it will cover up the steering sensitvity but to get it even close to stock you will need the radius arms. I know this because I went thru it but maybe someone else can explain the physics. From my understanding it reduces the angle of the 3rd member (caused by the lift) back to stock. But once you add the correction radius arms and correct that angle you will almost certainly need a double yoke front drive shaft because now the angle at the drive shaft is much more severe. I hope that helps but if nothing else maybe it will gererate some some responses.
 

Peter Matusov (Pmatusov)
Senior Member
Username: Pmatusov

Post Number: 1199
Registered: 09-2002
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2004 - 08:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Perry, in the stock setup, the kingpin axis is tilted slightly back (by castor angle), so when you turn the steering wheel, you actually lift the front of the vehicle. The weight of the vehicle will push it down, forcing the wheels to return back to the stable location, just like a pendulum. When you lift the front end, you cause the radius arms to make a larger angle with the ground, and kingpin angle will make less and less angle with the vertical. At some point, you will lose the self-centering feature of the front suspension, and the vehicle will wander all over the place. I don't remember off the top of my head - what is the stock value of the Disco's castor angle - but, given ~40/60 weight distribution and short wheelbase of a Disco, even minor lift will make the truck squirrelly.
Adding the weight to the front helps in more than one way - you change the front/rear weight distribution, and also load the front more so to increase the "returning force."
The probability of shimmy to occur also increases with decreased castor angle - rather, the frequency of shimmy will become lower, and stock steering damper would not be able to suppress it. A stiffer damper helps - Bilstein or OME (I have both on different rovers, they both work great).
 

Papillon (Papillon)
New Member
Username: Papillon

Post Number: 7
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, January 06, 2004 - 09:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Peter,

Great post! Where or how did you get the 40/60 weight distribution figures?

Papillon
 

marc olivares (Pugs)
Senior Member
Username: Pugs

Post Number: 289
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Wednesday, January 07, 2004 - 12:47 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

peter,
nice explanation
stock spec castor is 3 degrees (+/- .5) positive.
a 2" lift is usually around 0 degrees castor.
a 3" lift is usually around -2 degrees negative castor.
double cardon shafts help with vibes if the castor is within 2 degrees of spec.
mulitple doubles in my opinion should never be used (way to heavy).
and of course there is always an exception to this general guide line. even discos set up with the same springs, corrected radius arms etc... will typically not yield the same results.
hope that helps,
marc
 

Clay W Davis (Cwdavis4)
New Member
Username: Cwdavis4

Post Number: 33
Registered: 09-2003
Posted on Wednesday, January 07, 2004 - 01:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I am planning on adding a 2" lift to my '03 Disco in the next month or so. Do I need to worry about adding a radius arm offset as well? No major weight additions other than factory brush guard, skid plates, and rock sliders if that makes a difference.

Regards...
 

Rick Neff (Lostinboston)
Senior Member
Username: Lostinboston

Post Number: 253
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Wednesday, January 07, 2004 - 11:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

RTE has offsets for a D1, not D2, or at least when i called them last. If you want you can send them your radius arms, and they can correct them. Adding a tt up front will fix the highway wander though. I would only fix the castors when i switch to ARB instead or want more room for bigger tires.
 

Mark (Roverwrecks)
New Member
Username: Roverwrecks

Post Number: 21
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 08:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I already have the RTE arms, both front and rear. Once I have the springs I'll give them a try, here is another questions. I bought some southdown equipment a while ago for my defender and when it sold I kept the equipment, looks like can use the rear diff gard, what about the front diff gard, has anyone here used a defender front diff gard on their disco or do I need different mounting brackets?

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration