data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09423/09423170aee20e432148f2bb6d8bf72d5cbbe804" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf5d6/bf5d67beecec107be0f05d95776ac4c3a1f954b5" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aecb/9aecbfb0e0a6d2695545d2ff4399c98864ab299f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e411/6e41175deec6462198d2b17d27c6c292a1455d44" alt=""
Erik Olson (Jon)
Senior Member Username: Jon
Post Number: 532 Registered: 02-2002
| Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2004 - 04:10 pm: |
|
http://www.neyland.com What about the PS10? Could this be easily converted to coil-sprung? If this truck shares a common chassis with the 110, why go to leaf-sprung? Is it a significant cost savings? It's got the Iveco 8140 2.8l motor as standard, and they supply the fitted LT-85 transbox to Land Rover. Also, this truck is part-time 4wd, presumably with Auto-Free hubs? Naturally, I'm certain we couldn't get one easily into the U.S. e |