Shocks - Are Bilstein or OME firms th... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2004 Archives - Discovery Technical » Archive through January 29, 2004 » Shocks - Are Bilstein or OME firms the better on-road performer? « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Jason Pyles (Jpyles911)
New Member
Username: Jpyles911

Post Number: 9
Registered: 06-2003
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 01:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Does anyone have experiences to share with Bilsteins or OME firms on a Disco II with 16" tires and stock springs? They are both about the same price. My goal is mostly on-road performance, as that is where the car is driven 95% of the time.
 

Peter Matusov (Pmatusov)
Senior Member
Username: Pmatusov

Post Number: 1271
Registered: 09-2002
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 01:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

oh no...
 

Bill Bettridge (Billb)
Dweb Lounge Member
Username: Billb

Post Number: 1394
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 03:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Bilsteins......no question for on-road performance

Bill
 

Paul Kleinschnitz (Rovrjnky)
New Member
Username: Rovrjnky

Post Number: 39
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 03:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

what about off-road performance?
 

marc olivares (Pugs)
Senior Member
Username: Pugs

Post Number: 309
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 04:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post





go with the bilsteins
 

Ho Chung (Thediscoho)
Moderator
Username: Thediscoho

Post Number: 501
Registered: 02-2002
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 04:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

aside from on road or off road, the bilstein shocks fit the stock discos perfectly.
but once you lift it by putting taller springs, then you should get longer shocks as well, as the bilsteins will be topping out often.

so, listen to bill and go with bilsteins.


Ho Chung
 

Paul Kleinschnitz (Rovrjnky)
Member
Username: Rovrjnky

Post Number: 41
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 04:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

ya, thats what I had on my RRC and was very pleased.

thanks guys.
 

david neal (Davidn)
New Member
Username: Davidn

Post Number: 1
Registered: 01-2004
Posted on Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 08:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

bilsteins - its all that rover specialists recommend. standard bilsteen can cope with a 2 inch lift.
 

Brian O'Connor (Hooky)
Member
Username: Hooky

Post Number: 63
Registered: 09-2003
Posted on Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I got the B's - love em' way better then the woodheads - can't compare to OME though - sorry.
 

Bill Ross (Billr)
Member
Username: Billr

Post Number: 134
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 11:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I've had both. Bilsteins on a '94 Disco and OMEs on a '93 RRC with MD OME springs. Can't say I can generally tell much difference either way (hey, when its -40C, they are all hard as a rock) with the vehicle setups in mind. But if I had to say anything, the Bilsteins seem to be a wee bit softer initially. That is, the overall stiffness seems comparable between the two but the initial impact seems a bit harsher with the OMEs. But that could be spring rate differences as well.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration