Author |
Message |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09423/09423170aee20e432148f2bb6d8bf72d5cbbe804" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf5d6/bf5d67beecec107be0f05d95776ac4c3a1f954b5" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aecb/9aecbfb0e0a6d2695545d2ff4399c98864ab299f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e411/6e41175deec6462198d2b17d27c6c292a1455d44" alt=""
Chad Mayes (Cmayes)
Member Username: Cmayes
Post Number: 109 Registered: 04-2003
| Posted on Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 02:39 pm: |
|
I'm looking at buying a 95 Range Rover with 111K on the clock. The block was replace at 85K due to crack, was this a common problem? I had a 95 Disco. What should I know about Range Rovers compared to Discos? Any problems that are specific to one beast or another? Anything special I should look for? Thanks. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09423/09423170aee20e432148f2bb6d8bf72d5cbbe804" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf5d6/bf5d67beecec107be0f05d95776ac4c3a1f954b5" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aecb/9aecbfb0e0a6d2695545d2ff4399c98864ab299f" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e411/6e41175deec6462198d2b17d27c6c292a1455d44" alt=""
Aaron Richardet (Draaronr)
Senior Member Username: Draaronr
Post Number: 548 Registered: 09-2002
| Posted on Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 07:09 pm: |
|
Rust, Rust, Rust. Check the tailgate and under the floor in the front, also rear wheel wells inside. 95 in my opinion is a sweet year with the interior, being discoish. VSC not as good as lt-230, air suspension sucks ass, other than that has to be one of my favorite rovers. with coil spring swap and lt230 sweet rig. ETC was also on them that year which is helpful |
|