Dunlop Rover AT

DiscoWeb Message Board: Archives - All topics: 2001 Archive - Technical Discussions: Dunlop Rover AT
  Subtopic Posts   Updated


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Sean on Thursday, March 15, 2001 - 10:58 am: Edit

How good are the Rover AT's. I know alot of you run the Rover RT but I don't need anything that hardcore yet. I'm just looking for stock replacement since the Michelins cost so much. Thanks for the input.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Frank on Thursday, March 15, 2001 - 11:52 am: Edit

I'm running that exact tire. It's good on the road, but it sucks in the mud. Bad. I think ATs are the El Camino of tires-- you try to get the best of both worlds but you wind up with a whole lot of nothing.

The tread pattern isn't very aggressive.

My two cents.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Sean on Thursday, March 15, 2001 - 05:27 pm: Edit

Since I don't play in the mud, I am not too concerned about that. I do need good wet traction and good dependability on gravel surfaces (Arizona has alot of gravel!) Thanks for the input. Anyone else?

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message   By Bill B on Thursday, March 15, 2001 - 05:35 pm: Edit

You still may want to consider the R/T. It has a heavier construction (more puncture resistance) - a seemingly long life on-road compound - great both dry and wet on the pavement - quieter than the stock XPC's and great off-road. You can get them in a close to stock size also. Just my opinion. (I love my R/T's :-)


Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation