Cand, Candy, Candy I can't let you go...

luckyjoe

Well-known member
Oct 10, 2004
462
129
New Jersey USA
more CL fun below

Show car range rover

00p0p_jmdaXyxJ7Np_600x450.jpg
 

squirt

Well-known member
Nov 13, 2008
824
13
Los Angeles
What kind of shitty car museum is that? Pimp-colored RRC between a W208 CLK and a R107 380 SL.... all covered with trash bags.
 

Tugela

Well-known member
May 21, 2007
4,762
563
Seattle
For that kind of money you can't even replace the missing fog lamp and crush can covers? On the bright side, this gem is still 1/7 the price of that Range Rover Chieftain.
 

kennith

Well-known member
Apr 22, 2004
10,891
172
North Carolina
This guy's a jack-ass. If he can't be bothered to pull it out into the natural world for good pictures, he can't be bothered to sell it.

Cheers,

Kennith
 

Rob371

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2016
150
1
Charlevoix, Michigan
So you slap some paint on a four thousand dollar truck and it's worth 54K?

I'm not a purist so I don't see the value in some of the asking prices for these vehicles.

How much heat will I receive for that comment?
 

Tugela

Well-known member
May 21, 2007
4,762
563
Seattle
Using a handy-dandy online inflation calculator, I figured out that a brand-new Range Rover that cost $38,000 in 1994 (that might not be right, but it's in the ballpark) would cost $63,000 in 2017 dollars to drive it off the dealership lot with fewer than 50 miles on it.

So to charge the equivalent of 86% of the inflation-adjusted retail price for a car that is many miles away from retail condition is a highly ambitious request.
 

p m

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 19, 2004
15,630
863
58
La Jolla, CA
www.3rj.org
Using a handy-dandy online inflation calculator, I figured out that a brand-new Range Rover that cost $38,000 in 1994 (that might not be right, but it's in the ballpark) would cost $63,000 in 2017 dollars to drive it off the dealership lot with fewer than 50 miles on it.
IIRC, a brand-new LWB was between 55 and 60k in 1995 dollars. Having bought a 6-year-old one for $7k was a coup.

OTOH, I bought a 3-year-old LR4 with 17kmi in 2013 roughly for the same amount of money (numerically, non-inflation-adjusted) as I bought a 3-year-old D1 in 1999 with 40kmi.
Rovers are getting far cheaper.
 

kk88rrc

Well-known member
Using a handy-dandy online inflation calculator, I figured out that a brand-new Range Rover that cost $38,000 in 1994 (that might not be right, but it's in the ballpark) would cost $63,000 in 2017 dollars to drive it off the dealership lot with fewer than 50 miles on it.

So to charge the equivalent of 86% of the inflation-adjusted retail price for a car that is many miles away from retail condition is a highly ambitious request.

Base was $47k for a SWB.
http://www.rangerovers.net/modelspecs/1994.html
 

jim-00-4.6

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2005
2,037
6
61
Genesee, CO USA
This guy's a jack-ass. If he can't be bothered to pull it out into the natural world for good pictures, he can't be bothered to sell it.

Cheers,

Kennith
He would have to PULL IT OUT to get it outside.
The odds of that thing running are very slim.

What a beautiful specimen, though.
Jinky hood, missing crush can covers, missing fog light, looks like it's sitting tilted but that might just be the hood.
To the good, the front seats look like they're in better condition than the drivers' seat was on my '01 P38.