Lol. So now an acquittal is not a not guilty verdict? You?re a special kind of stupid, Dipshit.
The Bundy?s were acquitted in round one.
Are you talking about the civil case regarding him being required to pay grazing fees? They lost.
That should be Round 1.
But, I assume you are talking about the Oregon trial? Note to dipshit: Oregon is NOT Nevada.
And some of those in Oregon were convicted. In fact, one is going to the special camp for boys early because he
disregarded the Oregon judge's order to have no contact with the Bundys.
But, that's par for the course for Bundy and his followers - they don't have to abide by Federal judge's orders/rulings, right?
Followers were acquitted in round two.
Some were accquited, some were convicted. You might want to ask the guy who
got 68 years for his participation in the Nevada standoff if he was acquitted.
Mistrial in round three.
?Loopholes?, right? Yawn. There is no case.
Mistrial does not equal innocent.
Here for your learning, from Merriam-Webster:
mistrial
: a trial that has
no legal effect by reason of some error or serious prejudicial misconduct in the proceedings
The Bundy?s did what reasonable people would have done when treated the way they?ve been treated.
So you DO think it's ok to threaten and point weapons at the police.
Are you a BLM (Black Lives Matter) supporter? Ya know, because they started by doing just that in Ferguson, MO.
Or is it just "justified" only when angry, delusional, white men do it in the name of FREEDOM!