Offroad Upgrades

jbrockiii

Well-known member
May 10, 2005
111
0
Mississippi
I agree with Campbell, the rear of the LR3 looks pretty bad. My wife can't stand the way the back looks but they do drive good and the Nav system on them is awsome. We test drove one recently in New Orleans. I hope a rear tire option becomes available.

The G4 version does look sharp and full of off road options. But the G4 Defender's the best. Can't wait till Rover brings the Defender back to the U.S.!

http://www.landroverg4challenge.com/main/medialibrary/mediaget.asp?i=315&v=3
 

nickb857

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2004
1,388
3
38
Las Vegas
jbrockiii said:
I agree with Campbell, the rear of the LR3 looks pretty bad.


It doesnt look to bad with the rear ladder on the back. it breaks up the large rear end of it and it looks better. Some rear lamp guards might help to.
 

jsonova99

Well-known member
Apr 14, 2005
1,683
0
47
Snow Hill, MD
they need some sort of a spare tire swing away to get that tire back on the back, that would look good and make it a lot more accessible. I hate vehicles with the spares tucked up underneath
 

SCSL

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2005
4,144
152
jsonova99 said:
they need some sort of a spare tire swing away to get that tire back on the back, that would look good and make it a lot more accessible. I hate vehicles with the spares tucked up underneath

Plus it's useless off road unless you plan to get hung up from the rear or tear the sidewall before it's even used.
 
S

ShaunP

Guest
ARB,ECB, Longranger and TJM will make stuff for them before long ,probably designing it now, They only started selling them here in Oz in April so they haven't had much time to have a play and test bars for airbag compliance etc.
 
D

ducati

Guest
SCSL said:
Plus it's useless off road unless you plan to get hung up from the rear or tear the sidewall before it's even used.
Not necessarily useless--I didn't touch mine once during a weekend of offroading, in places 2" lifted Discos were dragging their arses. So it's tucked up there pretty well.

Ideal? No. Beyond the theoretical possibility of tearing a tire or ruining a rim, it makes a trailside tire change much more of a chore. I know this from firsthand experience :D I'd much prefer a rear-mounted spare for that reason alone.
 

stu454

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2004
5,407
61
Atlanta, GA
Absolutely. Any designer that mounts the spare up under the truck is out of touch with real trail runners.

'Course, we knew that already. ;)

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, a mud-covered spare with only 1" of clearance to get it out from under the truck.......sheer bliss when you've just had a flat on the trail..........if you're a freakin' masochist (sp?).
 

spydrjon

Well-known member
Nov 9, 2004
1,223
0
Dacula, GA
www.oysterroast.com
stu454 said:
Absolutely. Any designer that mounts the spare up under the truck is out of touch with real trail runners.

'Course, we knew that already. ;)

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, a mud-covered spare with only 1" of clearance to get it out from under the truck.......sheer bliss when you've just had a flat on the trail..........if you're a freakin' masochist (sp?).


just another reason that LR3's suck ass
 

Penguin

Active member
Jun 23, 2005
32
0
52
Belgium
www.m-release.com
nah, that's all just a habbit.
I drove a Mitsu L200 (Santana in Us I think, it's the pick-up) and it also got the spare underneath.

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, a mud-covered spare with only 1" of clearance to get it out from under the truck.......sheer bliss when you've just had a flat on the trail..........if you're a freakin' masochist (sp?).

Tell me where the problem is?
As if you can't lift your vehicle to get to the spare tire, you won't even be able to take one of your rear tires off.
And what is wrong with a mud covered spare, if you're already playing in the mud? Afread to get dirty? then you should stay on the road ;)

So before judging, try it out first :cool:
 
Last edited: