BBS speed Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Feedback to DiscoWeb » Archive through August 30, 2003 » BBS speed « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

Tim (Snowman)
Senior Member
Username: Snowman

Post Number: 477
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, July 03, 2003 - 12:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

In no way do I mean to sound negative but what would it take to speed up this BBS? Is it a technical or monthly money issue? What would it take to improve it? I am on a DSL connection and it's much slower than others I have visited.
 

Chris Marcel (Gumarcel)
Senior Member
Username: Gumarcel

Post Number: 755
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, July 03, 2003 - 03:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

../15/18883.html"#333333">
 

Steve Andrews (Sillybus)
Senior Member
Username: Sillybus

Post Number: 283
Registered: 08-2002
Posted on Tuesday, July 15, 2003 - 12:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Chris - I am a bit confused about that link and how it addresses the question Tim asked.

The BBS system can be quite zippy at times. It is usually caused by site traffic that slows it down. The more people browsing, the slower it gets. This is mostly due to the "ghetto" (as far as technology today goes) file storage method. CGI isn't exactly what it used to be. If you compare the speed of this site to another BBS from lets say 5 or 6 years ago, I think you would find that it would be quite comparable under similar traffic.

You also have to contend with network congestion. I've noticed that at times it isn't necessarily the output stream from the server that is slow but routing between my location and this server.

There are several things that could be done to improve response time but most either cost money or considerable effort.
 

Brian Goodner (Bluewater)
Senior Member
Username: Bluewater

Post Number: 338
Registered: 03-2003
Posted on Tuesday, July 15, 2003 - 02:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

chris put that link there because we have already had this discussion before...
 

Brian Friend (Brianfriend)
Senior Member
Username: Brianfriend

Post Number: 1098
Registered: 09-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 16, 2003 - 12:55 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

"chris put that link there because we have already had this discussion before... " Brian why are you being so redundant about an obvious thing?
 

Steve Andrews (Sillybus)
Senior Member
Username: Sillybus

Post Number: 286
Registered: 08-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 16, 2003 - 08:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I must have inhaled too much carb cleaner last night but I would like to point out again (and read the thread that link goes to first) that it doesn't address Tim's question.

The thread was about image sizes and the extra bandwidth that would be used. Tim asked about the overall speed of the web site.

Since three of you are now agreeing that the link refers to how fast a page can draw I must be missing something. If one of you has a few moments, please explain this to me.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration