Is this enough articulation? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2002 Archives - Technical » Discovery » Is this enough articulation? « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
 

Kent
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I just finished building this in my garage. I am looking forward to getting it out on the trails. The tire is 42" off the ground. I still have a couple of bugs to work out but am very happy with it so far. What do you think?

rover1
 

Kent
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

sorry I used the back button
rover1
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Kent,

can you proceed with bugs?

peter
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

wow, 42 inches is what... about 1200 on the 20 degree ramp? impressive. really. what a sex machine. and here's a guy that is all action and no talk. :)

now to answer your question, no, it's not enough.
 

John Lee
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Kent,

Check your front brake hoses. That one in the pic looks maxed out.
 

Kent
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 01:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Bugs: Ordered two new front springs to lower vehicle 2". Rear I have enough adjustment. Orders new 26" brake lines from RTE the 24" are not quite long enough. Building new pan hard bar to make it longer. Play with springs, the left front and right rear have 5" more untravel. So far thats it.
 

Greg Davis
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Kent, that's awesome. What are you running up front? 3-link?
 

Marc
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

John,
is that a brake hose? I thought it was his antenna.
 

Kent
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

The front is a SG 3-link. The rear is RTE A-arm 1" extention with my own trailing arms about 37"
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

kent,

if you gonna still play with different springs, and if those are 2 inch body shocks,

i got some eibach coils sitting here for the 2 inch body shocks.

2x 12" rate 900
2x 14" rate 350
1x 10" rate 550
1x 10" rate 700

interested? let me know.
 

Kyle
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Better stock up on spring collars as well..... "It walks down stairs , alone or in pairs , AND MAKES A SLINKETY SOUND " :)


Kyle
 

Simon E. Arenas (Simon)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 02:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

wau.... impressive!

is it me or is it an optical illusion that the tucked in rear tire is turning to the truck's right?

weird..

Simon
 

niall forbes (Forbesn)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I think it's just an optical illusion. And it would turn the truck left not right. Which reminds me of those big fire trucks you used to see where the guy would steer from the back of the trailer. Those were cool, I always wanted to drive one. Anyway, that's a bit off-topic.

Disco looks great. What's your slalom time? ;-)
 

Matt M
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Superb.

Does that mod invalidate the warranty then ? :-)

I can see where you're coming from, but rear wheel thing is an optical illusion. Unless Kent has got 4 wheel steering on that baby too !!

Speaking of which, has anyone ever done that to a Disco ? I'm sure I remember seeing an off-roader with 4WS - both axels operating independantly, but I can't remember for the life of me where I saw it. I think it was a serious rock crawling beasty, maybe ?

Matt.
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

it ain't optical illusion. the rear wheel does indeed turn as the rear flexes.
 

Matt M
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

weird - how does that work ?

Matt.
 

Greg Davis
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Yea, it's caused by the arc of the radius arm. The farther it travels up (until horizontal) it moves to the rear. The farther it travels down it moves to the front.
 

Kyle
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Yup , you get the rear steering action going..

Kyle
 

Matt M
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 03:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

does it cause any problems ?

or are you going so slowly at any serious level of articulation that it doesn't really matter ?

Matt
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 04:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

no problems.
 

RVR OVR (Tom)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 04:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

"I just finished building this in my garage"

I was expecting something like a go-cart. LOL.

Nice job Kent. I guess I don't need flares for my puny 33's.

Tom
 

Anonymous
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 04:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Matt, think about this for a second. If you are in an area which requires that much flex and your axles are truly crossed that much, would the rear end not tracking correctly bother you? If you check out any of the rock crawling competitions, this is a "normal" occurrence. This is also a severe problem for all short arm Jeep suspensions, especially when they are lifted greater than 3 inches.
 

Dave M.
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 05:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Just out of curiousity, what would a stock Disco ramp out at?
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 05:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

stock disco? about 500? 600? but not 1200. LOL
 

Matt M
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 05:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Anon

I suspected as much, but you never know - some of the systems we design at work can have serious problems caused by what seem like a minor thing to anyone who doesn't understand it.

We don't get much rock crawling going on here in the UK !! Unfortunately, we're stuck with muddy lanes, and thanks the the mulseli eating sandal brigade, that bit of fun is slowly being taken from us now too - it is now illegal in many of the best parts of the UK to drive down 'green lanes'.

Any UK'ers interested in banding together and buying a decent sized bit of land dedicated to off-roading, contact me.

Matt.

[email protected]
 

JB
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 06:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

How are the springs and shocks mounted in the rear ? Can you send us a photo spread of this new pet of the month please. Enquiring minds want to know...


JB
 

M. K. Watson (Lrover94)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 06:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

WOW!
mike w
 

M. K. Watson (Lrover94)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 06:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

hmmm lets see, sale the stocks, eat pork and beans and hey i can sale a few body parts, really matt that is way cool.
mike w
 

RVR OVR (Tom)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 06:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Pet of the month -- LOL.

Yes, more photos Kent. You are a tease. Only two photos so far of that monster.

Tom
 

Phillip Perkinson (R0ver4x4)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 06:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Holy Cow thats bad ass. SOme more pictures would be cool too.
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 08:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Nice work Kent-
couple of questions though...
Are the front upper coilmounts linked to each other, and have any pics of the rear uppers?

GIT SOME

Craig
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 08:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

BTW-
You WILL post more pics,
Oh yes,
You Will post more pics...

:)

Craig
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 08:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

ok, time to toss my full jerry can in the fire -



this is a stock truck, no lift, 31" tires. the rock is about 38-40" tall, both rear tires on the ground.

i'll run away faster than any flames reach me :)

peter
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 08:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Ax programmed this page not to take jeep pics...
(Ho excluded)

try again -



peter
 

Anonymous
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 09:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

er
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 09:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Frame flex doesn't count Peter-
nice try....
Craig
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 09:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

dunno about frame flex
i had to get out of the jeep to take this photo -
no problems opening or closing the doors, neither the tailgate. it ain't chevy or baby jeep.

peter
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

It also ain't on level ground....
keep tryin..
Craig
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

one more thing:
Some blatant theft from the Pirate board, but seems appropriate here...
wrongforum
Craig
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Craig,

three other wheels are on level ground. I can take ya to the place and do it as many times as you want :)

this ain't on level ground -


right rear's 4" off the ground, left front - 4" into the ground.

but these are old photos, it's got some lift and some tires since :)

peter
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

what's this BS about it -

Upload security violation

Message sources do not match! If you used your browser's "Back" button, hit your browser's "Forward" button now and
try your upload from that page.

Please contact Axel Haakonsen if this problem persists.

every other time i try to upload the image.
here it is -
 

p m
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

ok, i give up on Netscape.

 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

What exactly is your point Peter?
And what does this have to do with Kent's Disco?
Take it to the Jeep thread...
Chrome has no place on this thread
Craig
 

Kyle
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Peter , I crack up everytime I see you posting pics of that big ass heap of shit. Every time I see it my eyes react with burning from the rich mixture I know is there.... Fucking common running bastards........ That bitch stalled on that rock didnt it ?

Kyle
 

Anonymous
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 11:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Peter your my HERO !
 

Anonymous
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 11:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

38"-40" my ass, you mean 38cm-40cm
hey wienerdog those are 2 different pics
 

alhang
Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 11:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I actually have one of those to work on this summer P.M.(it's a friend's), currently it gets about 9 mpg and the frame flexes more than most cars I have seen. Strangely enough he loves the damn thing and I will probably be installing a lift and fixing numerous other problems on it such as the almost total lack of vacuum. Even though I do like some jeeps, I personally would not constantly show off your gem on this board. Come on man, it's ugly... don't you see this? haha
 

Dave M.
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 08:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Stock RTI scores

http://www.offroaders.com/info/tech-corner/rti.htm

Found this to answer my own question...

'94 Land Rover Defender 90: 580
'95 Land Rover Discovery: 588
'92 Range Rover County: 670
'93 Range Rover County LWB: 588
'96 Range Rover 4.0SE: 600
 

Slider
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 10:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Kent...I don't think we need anymore pic's..

I keep getting VERTIGO each time I see that 1st pic...

Insane man...all that and leather too!!

I think your ready to start posting on pirate4x4!!

Slider
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 11:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

craig, it's a jeep thing. we'd not understand. LOL
 

Kent
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 12:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Thanks for the comments. I will get some more pics of the mounts posted in a few days. I need to get some action photos for the photo gallery. And yes there is a cross bar that runs over the motor connecting the shock towers. As for the RTI I ran a 1080 before the conversion running 10" travel shocks and RTE 3" springs. I expect to break 1300+ or I will be disappointed. These new shocks are 2.5" RaceRunners with 14" travel. 35.5" extended, 21.5" compressed. I also have a 2" body lift I build for extra clearance. I do drive this all the time on the street and set it up to handle and drive like stock, well close to stock.
 

Anonymous
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 12:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

That is the BEST disco I have ever seen!!!
PLEASE MORE PICTURES!!!
 

Brian
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 12:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Kent I think you should put it in the photo gallery with LOTS of photos and post all the mods and specs. Then we all can get a good look at the belly of the beast...
 

RVR OVR (Tom)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Somehow, I don't think Anonymous is serious.

Tom
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

hehehe

Craig, I don't give a rat's ass about chrome. I would've painted every chrome part black if i had time to do it. there ain't no point of bringing this jeep up on a jeep board, 'cause it is mostly stock.

Kyle, no, it didn't stall on this rock, neither on another. and no, it didn't run rich, and needed no tricks to pass the CA smog test.

Al, i found many people buy'em because they can be bought dirt cheap, and most of them have no slightest clue on how to get them running decently. here comes your friend's vacuum - mine has rock steady 17inHg at 550 rpm idle.

speaking of showing off my gem, you made me think of why did i do it. there's no modification in it that i can personally be proud of, and its market value is zero. i could have posted a pic of anyone else's truck as well. Kent's Disco is awesome, and i admire his work, but I can't think of a single reason I would do the same thing to mine.

speaking of ugly, i guess it's personal. some like LR's factory brush bars, i don't.

peter

p.s. for the record, on both pics that jeep has its front sway bar connected.
 

Kyle
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Peter I have a 1 Ton 4X4 Dually that will hump a rock just as nicely in stock form. But it just about sucks on any trail. Oh , and its nowhere nearly as common.....


Kyle
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

try parking a 1-ton dually in SoCal. I thought you didn't believe in purpose-built vehicles?

my point is that if you really need a shitload of articulation for the 'wheeling you do, look elsewhere. Or, you may end up with a truck that's unsafe to drive over 25 mph, or something that only has a land rover logo and a couple of body parts in it.

peter
 

Kyle
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Hmmm ,one of those old Heps are unsafe to drive over 25. Well , thats taking into consideration that the particular one will get over 25..


Kyle
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 01:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

oh come on Kyle. you know what i know and what i think about the whole shit. 2 days ago i took the heep out after it sitting in the garage for 8 mo after my stupid diesel incident, and (however shitty it is) it tracked straight on the highway, no wandering, no nutten. perfectly precise (if absurdly light) steering. A feeling i have already forgotten after putting a measly OME HD lift on the disco and rangie.

brakes is a different story...

peter
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

PM, I dare you to pull up at Donovans Steak house in the Jeep. LOL
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

i had no problems pulling up to Milligan's when it was still in business.

peter
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

That's why they went under to many Ecology rejects pulling up next to all the 175k German trash cars. Watch out some La Jolla Lawyer will sue you for driving that rolling EPA viloation. Play it safe and get some BC (Mexico) plates on it, if you did it would probbly qualify you for a car allowance from the welfare department.. LOL
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 02:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

LOL

the best reply i thought of myself
i think they went down 'cause of LJ live entertainment regulations.

besides, there's plenty of rustbuckets in LJ driven by local homeowners... you know, they rust the worst within the first 200 yards from the surf zone.

my disco reflects perfectly my home's location... '96 with rust under alpine windows...

peter
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 03:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

LOL, your on the other side of the rust belt, I think the rust is lack of Jiffy Car Wash...
 

my96disco (Trevorh)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 03:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

After reading this thread I would like to ask a follow up question. Is there ever enough articulation? :-)

Great job Kent. I have articulation envy...
 

Kyle
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 04:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Trevor , you might be better served by asking the question. "What will all this articulation get me " :)

Kyle
 

al h.
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 04:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

yes, too much articulation can bury half an axle in a hole, slowing upward progression and increasing the chances of breaking a driveline part. Usually long travel setups require longer links that are exposed more, you have to run bigger tires to help compensate. lastly how much tire/travel you need depends on where you live. sure it's neat having a vehicle like kent's, i'm sure engineering it is about as fun as driving it, but for me it would be overkill and the few trails near me would be too boring to go on anymore. here's an example of the damage too much travel can cause... http://www.people.vcu.edu/~ahang/CT/broke.jpg
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 04:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Al,

OUCH, How much more damage happened dragging it out?

Dee
 

alhang
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 04:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

not much, removed rear driveshaft and amazingly enough another guy that was there had a rear link handy... fixed it in the snow as the sun went down. got dragged out by another rangie owner and enjoyed a leisurely drive home on the front shaft. BTW anyone who's interested the drive from central CT to Richmond, VA was about 9 hours going 55mph. and the little 3.9 could spin the 235's with the greatest ease, don't know why.
 

Blue (Bluegill)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 04:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

hehe one sure thing Peter's pics have going for them is

dirt & rocks

vs.

asphalt & forklift

:)

(OK, graded dirt lot & forklift, not asphalt....)
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 06:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

PM's approach to a CB hoist, He actually was doing a major fluid change.. This is his back yard. the guy never really goes off road much. Dont let him fool you with all those photos on his site he is an expert with photoshop. LOL
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 06:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Dee,

i never do a major fluid change on a jeep. it doesn't keep any long enough to change'em.
(regardless of photoshop, that is :) )

peter
 

Dee Cantrell (Disco_Dad)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 06:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

That explains the trial markers, Green peace loves you man
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 08:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

So once again, I have to ask,
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH KENT'S DISCO!?
Craig
 

p m
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 09:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

pull your head from wherever it is, Craig, if you don't dig it, and push CapsLock once again.

peter
 

Craig M. Highland (Shortbus)
Posted on Thursday, April 18, 2002 - 09:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

That's my lame attempt at yelling Peter-
I'm just wondering why you bothered to post that junk on this particular thread...
Started off a decent thread about Kent's rig and you had to go and post that?..
Whatever...
Still didn't answer my question though..
Craig
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Friday, April 19, 2002 - 11:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

craig, how many times i have to tell you!
IT'S A GODDAMNED JEEP THING!!!

LOL

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration