Do i need spring cones or retaining c... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

DiscoWeb Bulletin Board » Message Archives » 2002 Archives - Technical » Discovery » Do i need spring cones or retaining clips??? « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
 

Blake Luse (Muddyrover)
Posted on Monday, July 15, 2002 - 11:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have an OME HD suspension on my D1
I need to know if i take my sway bars off will i need to buy cones or spring retainers or will my shocks not extend far enough to need them.

thanks
 

Ho Chung (Ho)
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 01:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

no need
 

Dee
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 10:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Good one Ho reverse advertising, Ill do it for you get the EE retainers it helps you from picking the springs up off the trail
 

John C.
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 10:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

What size shocks do you have?
 

JRoc
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 07:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Good question Blake, I was about to post the same question! I have a '95 Disco and OME Heavy springs all around. I also have Bilstein shocks and I just removed my rear sway bar. I was wondering if I'm going to need either rear cones (Rovertym) or Spring Retainers (EE). I was also wondering if I'll need extended brake lines. Help???
 

Mike B.
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 08:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I agree with Ho. In both situations, the shocks are limiting the down travel. You don't need cones, extended brake lines, or anything. Removing the anti-sway bars in the rear will not increase the down travel.

Thanks,
Mike B.
 

Clif Ashley (Cta586)
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 08:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I agree with Ho and Mike. Wait, if you get enough flex that you get a spring unseated, just jack it up with a hi-lift and push it back in. Its not a big deal. If that does happen then you know you need them, but until then, I wouldn't worry. Be aware, but don't worry about it. Just my thoughts, I could be wrong.
 

Blake Luse (Muddyrover)
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 10:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

the shocks are

OME N76 in the back
 

Moe
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 - 11:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

With the N76s you will need retainers (or cones) and maybe extended brake lines. I found the N76s to be too soft and am looking for an alternative rear shock.
 

Roger Fastring
Posted on Wednesday, July 17, 2002 - 01:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I installed 10" fox shocks with 2+ inch RTE springs using RTE shock mounts. Wife took the car out west when we moved and I didnt have supervision over the Rover for 6 weeks. My first day back I looked at the rover to find the rear d/s spring out of its upper bucket and rubbing against the tire! One weekend in Baja and rest of the time on the street, but I wish I had installed retainers, would have saved a tire... Play it safe, buy retainers...
 

nadim
Posted on Wednesday, July 17, 2002 - 06:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I have the N76s...with OME 762 springs in the rear:
You DEFINITELY need Either retainers (defeats the purpose of the long travel shock/hard to put on the top of the 762s) Or cones.
FWIW, I have RTE cones and the thing just works fine.
As for the softness of the shocks, it is true, however, that softness is excellent offroad!
Nadim
 

Moe
Posted on Wednesday, July 17, 2002 - 11:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Nadim, I agree about softness being good to a point. The N76s seem to do well for me on the local trails under slower speed and a day load. Under faster trails and a fuller load there is a bit too much bouncing in the rear. I also think the N76s cause some issues in front to rear modulation/rocking on the highway. I cannot reccomend the N76s for the heavy Disco, will soon sell them and look elsewhere . . . I'm thinking Rancho all round :)
 

Mike Rupp (Mike_Rupp)
Posted on Wednesday, July 17, 2002 - 01:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

I wouldn't recommend Ranchos over OME. I'm on my second set of rears (9234). Both of the rears started leaking after only 6 months and had to be replaced. The other problem is that there doesn't seem to be a decent setting for the rear. Setting 4 works fine up front, but I can't seem to get the right setting in the rear.

I was actually thinking of getting the N76s for the rear, but now I'm not sure. It seems that there are too many issues to resolve just to get a couple more inches of flex.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration