| Author |
Message |
    
Ken Dunnington (Ihwillys)
| | Posted on Friday, September 27, 2002 - 08:29 am: | 
|
Looking at a rear seat cover on ebay, it's listed as fitting '97 and older Discos. True?
Thanks,
Ken |
Leslie N. Bright (Leslie)
| | Posted on Friday, September 27, 2002 - 08:32 am: |
|
Ken,
I don't know of any differences in the back seats... the one in the '95 is the same as the one in the '99 I had, except for fabric versus leather.
As far as the front seats go, the earlier Discos like my '95 have a seat that has grab-handles at the shoulders. My '99 had a normal headrest without the grab-handles. A seatcover that would fit one wouldn't properly fit the other. I think that in '97, you'll find both kinds of seat styles, so, take that into consideration.
FWIW...
-L
PS: My guess is that it was originally packaged around '97, and thus advertised as '97 and earlier... no guarantees, but, that's my hunch.... |
Carter Simcoe (Carter)
| | Posted on Friday, September 27, 2002 - 11:48 am: |
|
I have a 98 and have been in a 97 as well and I don't remember any difference (didn't take a tape measure to them or anthing though). I would tend to agree with Leslie's hunch. |
Ira
| | Posted on Friday, October 04, 2002 - 02:11 pm: |
|
The back seats are different!
I own '97 NA Disco and the back seat does not have an arm rest that folds down in the center. I have serval friends that own '98 LSE / '99 SE NA Disco's and their rear seats do have the folding arm rest in the back seat.
Hope this helps in the rear seat mystery... |
|
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page