leafsprung said:
You might actually take a look at them before you toss any more. You might realize they are significantly better than you have led yourself to believe. They make alot more sense than a ford 9 inch.
I'm an employee,... and when the boss says scrap them, I do so.
I don't readily agree with them being better than a 9 inch, and by NO means am I a Ford fan...
A Sals gives up a lot of ground clearance, just like a 60, so if you're telling me that doesn't matter, maybe we just wheel in different terrain. The same could be said of a corp. 14, where this is the only rear that Detroit doesn't have to provide a new carrier for.
I'm not saying that a Sals can't be built to "almost not break", but the original post was someone was looking to turn a 109 into an expedition rig, with a Series( I assume) Sals rear (10 spline), Yes I know that these were used in the 1 ton versions as well, .....
Personally I feel that ALL rover axles in STOCK trim suck the minute you go above the duty of stock. Dana's would be a far better choice as well.:yawn:
Also, by running a non rover axle set might prove to easier to repair if you break down in some remote location and the local mechanic asks what year is that Jeep(WTF). Yes I know parts can be ordered and drop shipped, but if said mechanic hasn't even seen a rover before,.. I don't know if I'd want him working on it. Unfortunately, those said mechanics usually have a fair amount of exper. fixing Ford, Chevy crap., so Dana's and 9 inchers seem better.