I have to come to MontrealRR90's defense on a couple of issues.
First, I want to acknowledge that the type of conversion he did will not be legal in a number of states in the US (and that number is growing).
Second, I also want to acknowledge that an EFI system has a number of benefits over carburettors, not the least of which, when wroking, are efficiency and dependability.
However, as an owner of a 4.0L Edelbrock carburetted Range Rover (1985) that I have put almost 70K miles on over the last six years, I can understand why he wanted to convert his induction system.
I also want to dispute a number of assertions made on this thread and my contentions come from first hand experience.
First, if MontrealRR90 keeps his cats he wil have no problem passing any emissions test where a sniffer is used. I don't know how Canada or Quebec tests their automobiles but I do know that when I took my truck through emissions in CT in April, with two cats, it emitted almost nothing and passed with flying colors.
Second, after years of running carburettors on my '85 (it was initially Federalized in 1985) I replaced them when I upgraded to a 4.0L. The original cats lasted over fifteen years and my truck passed numerous emissions test so a claim that running carurettors will ruin your cats in two month is a bit dubious to me.
Third, I would NEVER recommend a Davis Unified distributor. They don't fit, I know, I had one. Only last week at British By the Sea I was discussing the FAILURE of DUI with Arthur from Rovers North. He showed me the grinding that had to be done to get their distributor to fit on the Rovers North Disco and when it was in it was unreliable. Call Rovers North and ask Arthur why they're not carrying the brand any longer. Give Atlantic British a call too and ask them why they dropped DUI as one of their specials and now offer Mallory.
Edelbrock offers an offroad set up for their carbs and while I won't say that it solves all the potential problems one might encounter offroading with a carburetted engine, it is a definite improvement. All these horror stories about carbs just makes me wonder how Land Rover ever got its reputation considering that it was built on old four bangers knocking around with old SU's and Zenith's.
As far as efficiency is concerned, I have been getting a little over 13 mpg in my Range Rover which has a 2" lift, roof rack, winch, 245/75/16's ect. So I don't think it is fair to make claims of 8-9mpg. Maybe with knackered Strombergs but with the Edelbrock MontrealRR90 might even see and improvement over EFI if it wasn't working right. I know that when I had a brand new Range Rover back in '94 I was thrilled to see 13 mpg. Ordinarily, mileage was barely aboue 12 mpg.
Finally, I love reading all the threads about fault codes and bad sensors and so on and so on. I understand MontrealRR90's desire to be free of all this crap.
First, I want to acknowledge that the type of conversion he did will not be legal in a number of states in the US (and that number is growing).
Second, I also want to acknowledge that an EFI system has a number of benefits over carburettors, not the least of which, when wroking, are efficiency and dependability.
However, as an owner of a 4.0L Edelbrock carburetted Range Rover (1985) that I have put almost 70K miles on over the last six years, I can understand why he wanted to convert his induction system.
I also want to dispute a number of assertions made on this thread and my contentions come from first hand experience.
First, if MontrealRR90 keeps his cats he wil have no problem passing any emissions test where a sniffer is used. I don't know how Canada or Quebec tests their automobiles but I do know that when I took my truck through emissions in CT in April, with two cats, it emitted almost nothing and passed with flying colors.
Second, after years of running carburettors on my '85 (it was initially Federalized in 1985) I replaced them when I upgraded to a 4.0L. The original cats lasted over fifteen years and my truck passed numerous emissions test so a claim that running carurettors will ruin your cats in two month is a bit dubious to me.
Third, I would NEVER recommend a Davis Unified distributor. They don't fit, I know, I had one. Only last week at British By the Sea I was discussing the FAILURE of DUI with Arthur from Rovers North. He showed me the grinding that had to be done to get their distributor to fit on the Rovers North Disco and when it was in it was unreliable. Call Rovers North and ask Arthur why they're not carrying the brand any longer. Give Atlantic British a call too and ask them why they dropped DUI as one of their specials and now offer Mallory.
Edelbrock offers an offroad set up for their carbs and while I won't say that it solves all the potential problems one might encounter offroading with a carburetted engine, it is a definite improvement. All these horror stories about carbs just makes me wonder how Land Rover ever got its reputation considering that it was built on old four bangers knocking around with old SU's and Zenith's.
As far as efficiency is concerned, I have been getting a little over 13 mpg in my Range Rover which has a 2" lift, roof rack, winch, 245/75/16's ect. So I don't think it is fair to make claims of 8-9mpg. Maybe with knackered Strombergs but with the Edelbrock MontrealRR90 might even see and improvement over EFI if it wasn't working right. I know that when I had a brand new Range Rover back in '94 I was thrilled to see 13 mpg. Ordinarily, mileage was barely aboue 12 mpg.
Finally, I love reading all the threads about fault codes and bad sensors and so on and so on. I understand MontrealRR90's desire to be free of all this crap.