What I don't really understand is why fire Wagoner now? GM has two months to negotiate extremely complex deals with multiple groups (union, bondholders, dealers, parts suppliers) and the lead guy, who all trusted and respected, is gone? Who's going to replace him and that good will in less than a month? Seems like GM is being set up to fail.
I'm also waiting for the shoe to drop on the gov't reason why GM can't continue. If it was due to too much debt, then that is an issue with the other parties not willing to give concessions (take less $, less benefits, etc), and can be solved in bankruptcy. If on the other hand, GM wasn't planning on making more "Green" or green enough cars (read: fewer trucks/SUVs), then this is just central planning; it will doom GM.
Finally, why not the tough love with the banking/finance industry? We've thrown $170Bln at one company - AIG - and the main people that wrote the CDSs are still in place (and getting bonuses), yet the auto industry (which employs more people), who has asked for what, less than $40 Bln (?), gets pilloried? Is it because cars don't fit the Green/liberal agenda?
I'm also waiting for the shoe to drop on the gov't reason why GM can't continue. If it was due to too much debt, then that is an issue with the other parties not willing to give concessions (take less $, less benefits, etc), and can be solved in bankruptcy. If on the other hand, GM wasn't planning on making more "Green" or green enough cars (read: fewer trucks/SUVs), then this is just central planning; it will doom GM.
Finally, why not the tough love with the banking/finance industry? We've thrown $170Bln at one company - AIG - and the main people that wrote the CDSs are still in place (and getting bonuses), yet the auto industry (which employs more people), who has asked for what, less than $40 Bln (?), gets pilloried? Is it because cars don't fit the Green/liberal agenda?