http://www.forbes.com/2002/05/27/0527feat.html 1948 Land Rover is one of Forbes featured vehicles in this article.
forbes article said:True, you might want heat, a hardtop and other niceties, but the point of the original Land Rover was simply that it would go anywhere, not that it would be comfy or cute or look cool. It would get you there but, like any good horse, it would be dumb, there'd be flies, and you'd have to take care of it. For $14,000, Land Rover might find a lot more customers who want cheap transport that can also climb mountains.
apg said:Snip
Too bad...Rover could have *owned* the 4WD market if they had taken their heads out of their corporate arses. Then again, they could have owned the market in the early 1970's if they had wanted to back then. Instead, they bailed....
I wish Land Rover still made a Land Rover....
edthediscoman said:I too love the 72 TR6....
I have one that needs a new tranny. Bought the car 16 years ago (89) when i was 19 and stupid. It was a childhood dream to have a LR and a TR6.....now here they are, and both need work, but its a fun hobby with British cars!!
Ed
BeachRover said:I too had a '72 TR6, it was my first car. Man that thing was great. I remember that it was a pain in the ass to find the "red line" michellins to fit it.