If you had to pick between the same job in the following locations, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas/Mexico Border, or a worse job in Norther Cal, what would you choose and why? All jobs pay the same amount of money, one is just much worse.
ArmyRover said:I thought my PCS move options sucked..
kennith said:Mississippi or Oklahoma.
Screw California. The scenery is not worth the headache.
Texas is a great state and I've lived there, but the border is just too frustrating nowadays, the demographic isn't to everyone's taste, and your kids will be required to learn Spanish. Borderland Texas is rubbish, anyway. The rest of the state can be wonderful, though. Still, Oklahoma provides many of the same benefits.
Both Mississippi and Oklahoma have pretty unobtrusive firearm regulations, and that's of importance to me.
The end result would depend on how much land I could afford and where I had to afford it. I hate cities. If the same job put me in a city in one state, and the country in another, there isn't much of a choice.
Cheers,
Kennith
paxton said:I grew up in Mississippi. My parents live there. Every time I visit, I realize why I left. That state sucks more than you can imagine.
Anywhere that illegal immigration is an issue would be problematic. Not necessarily the immigrants, but public services and politics...
You know why Texas doesn't slide into the Gulf of Mexico? Because Oklahoma sucks. Oklahoma ranks up there with Nebraska, Kansas, and the Dakotas as places I'd never want to live. Landscape is way too boring.
I would move to Northern California. Been there, wish I could move back. Where I was was beautiful, temperate. The only problem is it's still California.
mgreenspan said:Hah. Worst part Is I have to switch to a different aircraft. The Cali option would pretty much ensure I don't fly manned ever again which has other implications for future jobs.