I'm at Ft. Walton Beach with my family... There is a middle school cheerleading competition going on down here. I've never seen swimsuits like this. I swear the girls at the Cheetah wear more than these 12 year olds. WTF????? And no, Dan, this thread is not useless without pictures. Can do without notifying my neighbors and being on Chris Hansen.
little whores
- Thread starter champana
- Start date
champana said:
I am so glad I have two boys
http://theblacksphere.net/2013/03/victorias-secret-is-coming-for-your-middle-schooler/
I teach in a middle school and there are usually a couple of girls from the school each week in the office for clothing that is way over the top. By 7th grade more than half are wearing make up, etc... Never ceases to amaze me what some folks think is acceptable for a child. And yes, I think 12 is still a child.
^chuck, by my standards 18 is still a child. my wife is a middle school teacher as well, the things she tells me about what children wear and the responses their parents make, regarding the responses teachers and administrators have amazes me.
but then again we are the society that has created the 5 year old beauty pageant queen all did up like a street walking whore.
its interesting how main stream suburbanites have lower standards than a motorcycle gang, regarding the innocence of a child.
but then again we are the society that has created the 5 year old beauty pageant queen all did up like a street walking whore.
its interesting how main stream suburbanites have lower standards than a motorcycle gang, regarding the innocence of a child.
seventyfive said:
True.
They let them do whatever the fuck they want for 18 years, and then buy them a four year round-ticket to party and puke in my town, which we already keep well-stocked with murderers, crooked cops, and sex offenders.
Somewhere along the line, many of the females decide it's a good idea to run around half-naked wherever they go, and many of the males decide to pick fights. Each of them expects to stagger into school the next day, having not experienced the dire consequences of their actions.
Indeed, they can't even wrap their brains around a proper consequence.
Cheers,
Kennith
+1 (I am not sure what motorcycle gangs' child innocence standards are, but they can't be lower than an upper-middle-class suburbia).seventyfive said:
they are mostly really innocent, just buying into the images they see on Disney and others. Seems they are so worried about looking right. I have even seen some come back from gym class in a different set of clothes- they wanted a different look for the afternoon?!?
Been doing a lot of family history (genealogy) lately. One thing that I've found is that in the 1700's it was not unusual for folks (children) to get married by the age of 13. This is mainly the girls. The first one I found was an 11 year old girl who married a 21 year old boy. At first I thought we had some birth dates wrong or just some bad info or the wrong person, etc.. But I've found this to be a regular thing. It was not uncommon for girls to be giving birth at 14 or 15 years old, proceed to have 12 kids and ultimately die giving birth...
I honestly can't believe parents allow their kids to wear what they do in today's age. But it could be worse.
I honestly can't believe parents allow their kids to wear what they do in today's age. But it could be worse.
mjbrox said:
My sentiments exactly, especially raising my son in Los Angeles, (now 15 and doing a wonderful impersonation of an adolesant brat
)
D Chapman said:
Humans enter a breeding frenzy in their early to mid teens. That's the way we are built, and you've really got to remember that fact if you plan to keep your kids in line.
In the past it was not only accepted; nobody gave it much thought at all. Hell, if you go back far enough, females we think of as "young" today would be considered worn slam out, and reviled as harlots if unmarried.
Parents would go well out of their way (at great expense sometimes) to pawn them off. Some societies still operate that way. I've encountered it first-hand; a little too first-hand, actually. That was one hell of a cultural conflagration.
Who'd have thought I'd ever run out of a town in the middle of the night because I refused to sleep with someone's daughter?
Their culture is different, just as ours was in the past. I recognize that, and I understand it. By understand I mean, of course, that I understand I can run faster confused than you can mad.:rofl:
What I don't understand is everyone agreeing to rules that nobody intends to follow, natural or not, and then complaining about the state of society. That's what's happening here.
A teenager's primary function is to attract a mate. If you don't want them to do so, put a stop to their efforts. Just like anything else in life, it's about advertisement and competition. You have winners and losers.
Parents seem to have a tough time deciding which is more desirable, and just ignore the issue entirely.
That's where they fuck up.
Cheers,
Kennith
D Chapman said:
In recent history if a girl was not married by her early 20's she would be considered socially humiliated
Did anyone actually read Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" set in the late 1800's Mrs Bennet's main concern was finding husbands for her 5 daughters before they became "spinsters"
The term originally identified girls and women who spun wool. In medieval times, this was one of the few livelihoods available to a woman in order to live independently of a male wage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinster
Families would be concerned about who would provide for their daughters, eldest son inherited the estate, younger sons joined the army, or the church. The choices for women were rather limited.
Surviving childhood was an accomplishment, in the 1600's life expectancy was around 35 years old.
For the landed class and aristocracy bloodlines and inheritance were the motivation behind arranged marriages and the girls would be married at 12 - 13 years of age.
I have a 15 year old son in high school here in West LA, frequents a local skatepark especially on Friday afternoons straight after school and there is usually a steady procession of girls in the local coffee shop rest rooms getting changed before meeting up to hang out, they go in looking like normal teenage girls and come out dressed as if they were at best "hostesses" in a Las Vegas club. The school enforces the dress code at school and on school buses but afterwards is another matter.
Discoweb never ceases to surprise me. Some days it's back and forth ad nauseam on guns/global warming/the president, other days it's criticism of cheap fuck trucks/soft shackles/suspension hack jobs, and today a thread entitled "little whores" turns out to be a reasonably interesting and mildly educational historical and cultural discourse.
Makes the donations worthwhile.
Makes the donations worthwhile.
kennith said:
I agree entirely about agreeing to follow rules that nobody can follow... that's absolutely dead-on when it comes to society as a whole, and our standards of conduct.
I don't think you can stop a teenager from trying like hell to get laid, though. It's built-in. Perhaps the only thing that can be done is to guide their efforts in a constructive way. Rather that dressing up like a fucking whore, maybe encourage young women to develop their intellect, emotional quotient, physical, artistic, and academic skills, etc. The whole person will attract superior partners vs the incomplete who focuses merely on promiscuity (or the appearance thereof).
knewsom said:
As a dad, I agree. As a man, WTF? You can't use the words women, intellect, and emotional quotient in the same library much less the same sentence. Not even the Library of Congress. Sorry, Jen. You're not part of the previous statement.
champana said:
It's one of those California things. :victory:
If you think us Men are any better, I've got a bridge to sell you...