Considering how radically the change was from the d2 to the lr3, I agree with the name change. Although I understand it was a marketing reasoning behind the name swap, think about the cost increase and all the gizmo's the lr3 has. The disco was suppose to be a everyday defender able truck with some of the amenities of the range rover. The renaming helps the dumb us market understand the truck is upscale, hence the increase in luxury and price.
I see in LR's line up the cost break down of the rr3 to rrsport to lr3, but then the gap between the lr3 and freelander, where's that truck? Wonder if they plan on filling it?
I think in the next year after we pay off my wifes audi, I might have to pick up one of those 50k freelanders as a daily driver and retire my disco as a dd. I also wonder how a used lr3 will hold its value?