NO AR 15 used at Newtown shooting..

[RBBailey]

Not what I said. I said I am sceptic about what police are saying. But now that you bring that up. Some Sheriffs tried to state that they would not enforce laws that they view as unconsitutional. They took the statements back. Afterall it is not police that decide law, they just enforce it. If they state formall otherwise in public, I doubt that they will keep their jobs long.

And yet, on several occasions Obama has done exactly the same thing. Being the chief law enforcement officer in the land doesn't seem to matter to him when it comes to certain laws like immigration, the budget, vote suppression, etc... He has been very open about this as well -- even hold press conferences to tell us that he will not obey the law.

 

[JohnB]

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/msnbc/50576292/#50576292

 

[jim-00-4.6]

... a shotgun is a shotgun, even if it looks like an AK...

Unless it's black, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it has a thumbhole stock, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it's an autoloader, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it holds more than 5 rounds, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if the police have one, then it's an assault weapon for THEM to have, but not YOU.

 

[kennith]

Unless it's black, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it has a thumbhole stock, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it's an autoloader, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if it holds more than 5 rounds, then it's an assault weapon.
Or if the police have one, then it's an assault weapon for THEM to have, but not YOU.

They'd hate my 500, then. :rofl:

Cheers,

Kennith

 

[SGaynor]

Did those with an anti-gun agenda and various media outlets intentionally and collectively manipulate facts, take advantage of ignorance, and tailor their promotion of events in an effort to encourage erroneous assumptions, control common perception, and create the beginnings of division and disorder within the population?

Was their action prearranged in order to quicken response and better take advantage of the next big shooting?

Is every opportunity taken to refocus attention back to an emotional event; the facts of which are deliberately avoided and left to the imagination?

I believe this all to be true, and why wouldn't it be? It's a good plan. If you've got an agenda, it stands to reason you'll do whatever is in your power in order to steer toward it. If you know it will be helped if built upon the foundation of tragedy (this can nearly always be true), why would you not take advantage of such an event?

Clearly, you believe in your cause, and when you truly believe in a cause, it becomes easier to justify the methods used to support it.

The best way to control a person is not to lie. It is better to strategically leave blanks for them to fill in, while making sure the information most easily accessed meets your approval. That can be entirely literal, when adjusting a person's opinion, or more abstract; dealing with their basic perceptions.


Kennith

Case in point: Albany police chief suppresses story on people using an AR rifle to repel home invaders while he's helping Cuomo get an assault weapons ban rammed through.




http://www.wham1180.com/pages/boblonsberry.html?article=10724782