That RRC everyone wants? Here it is.

cosmic88

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2010
436
0
Florida
could be wrong.... for that much I would think it would have the original wheels at least and I did not know any '94's came with an LT230??
 

Tugela

Well-known member
May 21, 2007
4,764
564
Seattle
I think I just Cornish Creamed my pants. Shouldn't those Castor alloy wheels be Cyclones? And seriously, the prices on those factory options are ridiculous. $456 for rear lamp guards? $1,116 for the brush bar? Pretty truck, and I'd sooner spend $35K on a pristine Range Rover Classic than on some faux-historic Longitude Expedition Disco 2 with stickers on it. But I'm not going to buy either.
 

Blueboy

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
3,217
469
Back in the USA; Rockwood, PA
Shouldn't those Castor alloy wheels be Cyclones?

Yep.

Totally agree on spending money on a RRC vs a stickered DII and already have.

OEM Rangie stuff always has been nuts even back then.

The original base price for a '94 RRC LWB was $50,200 to start.
 

Tugela

Well-known member
May 21, 2007
4,764
564
Seattle
The original base price for a '94 RRC LWB was $50,200 to start.

Using a handy dandy inflation calculator I learned that $50,200 in 1994 is the same as $81,000 today. Most of the Range Rovers for sale at my local dealership are north of $100,000. So the normalized price of the Range Rover has increased by about 24% in 2016 dollars over the past 22 years. The amount of technology and quality has gone up quite a bit, too. Whether or not today's prices are reasonable compared to 1994's is not for me to decide, as I have neither the interest nor the income to own a 2016 Range Rover.