Tire Pressure

mike97d1

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2004
1,085
1
Wilmington,NC
I know it has been addressed on this board before, but though I might bring it up again.
Maybe we can just list vehicle / tire size / pressure. This can be a good reference in future searches.

For example:
D2 / 285-60-18 / 36 front 42 rear (about to try 38 all around)
 

Nomar

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2004
6,078
13
Virginia
I always run higher pressure in the rear tires if its highway driving with a loaded up vehicle; maybe 45-50 in the rears and 32-40 in the fronts.

Offroad= even low pressures all around
 

stu454

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2004
5,407
61
Atlanta, GA
D1 235/85R16 Load Range E, 40 psi front, 44 psi rear. I may drop both a bit to see if I can improve the handling. It's been a bit squirrelly at speed since I bought new tires.
 

K-rover

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2010
2,179
69
Raleigh, NC
The last time I ran E load tires with 40 psi all around they cupped pretty bad.

Im about to go back to E load MT's and run lower pressures.

I dont like how much bulge my D load A/T's
have...even at 40psi.
 

ERover82

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2011
3,923
460
Darien Gap
This would be more valuable if the quoted pressures were obtained by doing patch tests or manufacturer recommendations based on axle weights, but I have no idea how you came to these pressures or how your tires fared in the long term.
 

p m

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 19, 2004
15,643
867
58
La Jolla, CA
www.3rj.org
Mike_Rupp said:
So what you're saying is that you like 40psi?
LOL, that's just about right.
Two things seemed to be important to me - lateral stability, and equal pressure front and rear.
I found that I cannot find any difference in handling by pumping the tires beyond ~40 psi (it may be different for skinny tires like 215/85 or 235/85), but the ride was getting progressively harsher. So I settled on 40-42.

Front to rear difference: there were two reasons in LR's pressure choice - one obvious, to closer match the rolling radius of lighter-loaded front tires to that of heavier-loaded rear tires. I buy that.

Another was to go slightly beyond that, and introduce understeer by reducing the rolling radius of the front tires below that of the rear tires. This is okay on a stock truck with open differentials; if you have lockers, the understeer is greatly exacerbated under throttle, and changes with almost as much oversteer when the lockers are unloaded and open. Similar tendency occurs on lifted trucks due to change in suspension geometry under throttle and braking.
A few white-knuckle rides on I-70 between Aurora and Grand Junction made me realize that I'd rather live with a neutrally-behaving vehicle than with one with that much temperament. You can't imagine how much difference (for the better) was brought about by extra 5 psi in front tires.
 

mike97d1

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2004
1,085
1
Wilmington,NC
EricTyrrell said:
This would be more valuable if the quoted pressures were obtained by doing patch tests or manufacturer recommendations based on axle weights, but I have no idea how you came to these pressures or how your tires fared in the long term.

This is the 2nd set of 285/60/18 Nitto Terra Grapplers, I ran the same 36/42 psi in the first set, and got right around 50k miles out of the set with very even wear. I rotate front to back, back to front (never cross) every other oil change.
I never cross on my rotations cause I had a set of Yokohama Geolanders on my D1 that cupped like crazy. It was the only tires I have ever crossed when rotating and the only cupping I've ever had. Not sure if it was the crossing or the tires, but i'll stick to just front to back