3.9 Timing chain and gears--- changing for performance stuff?

SLC99Disco

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2006
228
0
Utah
Hey guys I am in the process of rebuilding a 3.9 for my Classic and I was just wondering if it would be worth it to purchase a performance timing chain and gear kit instead of just a replacement kit?

I am going to used timing chain and gears made for the Buick 231 V-6 (straight swap from my understanding) and I have found some kits have a 3 keyed crankshaft gear that will allow me to retard or advance the timing by 4 degrees. My thought here is to retard the timing 4 degrees to get a little extra top end power out of the 3.9.

What are the engine guru's thoughts on this?

Here is a pic of the Edelbrock kit, part # 7828
 

Attachments

  • edl-7800.jpg
    edl-7800.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 31

SLC99Disco

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2006
228
0
Utah
And here is a shot of the regular style, you can see the single key slot on the crank gear
cca-3202_w.jpg
 
Last edited:

MUSKYMAN

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2004
8,277
0
OverBarrington IL
I think you are asking for trouble...the lucas system is picky enough.

you dont want top end power in a 4x4 anyways...keep it simple

put in a crower cam and a cheap timing set and be done with it, the stock timing sets were plastic toothed crap so even a cheap timing set will be a upgrade:D
 

SLC99Disco

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2006
228
0
Utah
MUSKYMAN said:
I think you are asking for trouble...the lucas system is picky enough.

you dont want top end power in a 4x4 anyways...keep it simple

put in a crower cam and a cheap timing set and be done with it, the stock timing sets were plastic toothed crap so even a cheap timing set will be a upgrade:D

Thats kinda what I was thinking, I started looking at the timing set just to replace the plastic toothed stuff, but then started thinking it might be fun to play with an semi-adjustable set up :)
 

lwg

Well-known member
I did this with a cam on a 3.9L. I think I ended up advancing the timing 4*, which ever gives more low end torque. Honestly couldn't tell a difference. I even added some Headers and a 4.2L Fuel map chip...
 
I'm a fan of doing things simply, especially if one is not ABSOLUTELY certain of what they are doing.

Time it the way the book shows, but use the best parts you can. The steel replacement set that D&D sells is a great timing set, the double roller set is overkill for most engines. My 4.2 is being built with the double roller set, but I have some $ to blow (first time in a LONG time) and I want to do it once.

The steel set from D&D is even less expensive than stock and better too!
 

SLC99Disco

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2006
228
0
Utah
BFox said:
I thought the Buick parts that swap over are from the 215 V8, not the 231 V6.

Almost positive that its the same engine minus 2 cylinders, the 231 parts I am gonna use are from the odd fire v-6
 

robertf

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2006
4,801
366
-
probably the same as a bruick 350 too

A friend of mine advanced his crower 230 cam on his 4.2 whatever the minimum is and it sucked. It ran noticeably better in the stock config.
 

SLC99Disco

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2006
228
0
Utah
robertf said:
probably the same as a bruick 350 too

A friend of mine advanced his crower 230 cam on his 4.2 whatever the minimum is and it sucked. It ran noticeably better in the stock config.

I am confused? Did it suck or did it run better?