jsonova99 said:
Out of curiousity, what is the best answer for the Series II? I would have made this same mistake in a few years had this thread not come up.
mikemeyer0 said:
It comes down to business. He ordered something, paid for it, got something different. RN fucked up, they should deal with it, if they don't wanna deal with it, oh well thats how they do business, and maybe thats what works for them. Customer service should be a main priority in a company, especially a parts company. I am not sure what RN's story is, I don't care. If customers are un-satisfied thats what matters to me. I am going to pay more attention in how it worked out for the customer, not the company. There may be a day I need something from RN but if I do they better be the only one that stock it....
I really feel weird here, defending RN instead of the little guy, given that I've not been entirely happy w/ RN in the past, but.... it was right there in the catalog, "II, IIa, III" with one part number.
RN offers replacement chassis, galvanized, from Marsland for either SWB or LWB vehicles.
http://www.roversnorth.com/store/pc-218-276-page-42-chassis-frame-outriggers-repair-kits.aspx
For 88", you can choose civilian or military.
For a 109", you can choose civilian or military for regular 3-door vehicles, a station wagon version, or a 6-cyl station wagon version.
For each entry, the catalog says "SII, SIIa, SIII", they don't have specific chassis for earlier ones versus later ones... the SIII is the most common, the "most improved design", and therefore the one that is built. There are differences, but *most* people that are doing a chassis swap are used to how Rovers are built and know that it's a III chassis and know how to deal with putting it under a IIa.
As I said earlier, I've got an 88" SIII, and I've put it back on a Marsland SIII chassis, but I replaced my tub with a IIa tub because of corrosion. Yes, the III chassis has tub tabs that the IIa wasn't set up for, but it still works.
If I didn't know that it was going to be different, but saw that it was the same part number, I would have called and asked what's up... and, knowing what I do know about them, I would expect that they would reply that there are some subtle differences, and that they could explain to me what modifications are needed.
I wasn't privy to the conversation you had with Mark, or with whoever you spoke to before you spoke to Mark, but I'm sure that if you had spoke with Les or Mike or Erik and made the situation clear, they could have explained what was needed. If you just called and say "I've got the wrong part", when there's only one part available, there's not much that can be done. If you called and said "This part is different than the one it's replacing, how do I make this part work or do I need something different..." then they could have explained what changes are needed. It's not like a chassis is a plug n' play part, it's not a bolt-on and go accessory, and they sometimes need modification to suit the application.
Would it have been nice to have known that up front? Sure.
FWIW: the Richards chassis are available as being specific to whatever year you need, but the quality seems to be bad, as in "cross-members being put on upside down" bad. Designa makes chassis for converting to coils. Otherwise, you'll end up getting a Marsland chassis, which will be a SIII chassis, regardless of who you buy it from.
I don't know Mark, and can't speak on his behalf. I'm sorry that you've had such a bad experience with this, and I'd be shopping with my wallet elsewhere if such had happened. I just want you to realize that, odds are, your choice elsewhere is probably going to end up being the same product.
Again, I wish you luck, and hope things go better from here.