SCSL said:I think all of you are just "going gay" ,,, LMAO ,,,
i went gay long ago. nothing sexier than a man in a Freelander.
SCSL said:I think all of you are just "going gay" ,,, LMAO ,,,
garrett said:now steve. now you are just sounding silly. downright giggly even.
what makes a stock Freelander more capable than a Liberty, let alone a CRV or similar vehicle?
the Liberty has low range putting the Freelander in the back seat right off the bat. without low range you are limited to what you can do out of the box.
i am sure in the right hands a Freelander can take you further than you'd imagine, but then again so will a CRV, Outback or Escape.
ps: and no they cannot come close to keeping up with Discos, RRCs or D90s.
u352 said:Ever see me drive bitch boy-I am good with that shit. I'll drive that Darby silly, circle silly-I'll even drive you too.
Jeeeeez
PS-Garrett is gay. He and I frolic in the woods together, deep in the woods wearing purple tights. Two and two hand in hand.
By the way-color is spelled with out the u damnit!
garrett said:.......ETC is not a substitute for any of those. maybe for the novice wheeler it is. just point and drive.
lagged said:Freelanders have ETC and sort of a CDL
syoung said:There isn't much comparison- the Freelander comes out on top. More clearance, ETC, less vulnerable components (steering etc). I've had to turn around on trails because the Liberty behind me couldn't go anymore.
The lack of low range really didn't hurt it much, but there are a few times when the engine just doesn't have enough grunt to get it- and low range would have helped. Not often though.