Interesting
Some import vehicles have known readiness issues. Many 1996-?98 Mitsubishi vehicles will have monitors that read "not ready" because setting the monitors requires very specific drive cycles (which can be found in their service information). Even so, these vehicles can be scanned for codes and the MIL light without regard to readiness status. On 1996 Subarus, turning the key off will clear all the readiness flags. The same thing happens on 1996 Volvo 850 Turbos. This means the vehicle has to be driven to reset all the readiness flags. On 1997 Toyota Tercel and Paseo models, the readiness flag for the EVAP monitor will never set, and no dealer fix is yet available. Other vehicles that often have a "not ready" condition for the EVAP and catalytic converter monitors include 1996-?98 Volvos, 1996-?98 Saabs, and 1996-?97 Nissan 2.0L 200SX models.
My M5 had a recall because the state testing equipment could not communicate, BMW had to reflash the ecu to come into line with state testing equipment.
Some import vehicles have known readiness issues. Many 1996-?98 Mitsubishi vehicles will have monitors that read "not ready" because setting the monitors requires very specific drive cycles (which can be found in their service information). Even so, these vehicles can be scanned for codes and the MIL light without regard to readiness status. On 1996 Subarus, turning the key off will clear all the readiness flags. The same thing happens on 1996 Volvo 850 Turbos. This means the vehicle has to be driven to reset all the readiness flags. On 1997 Toyota Tercel and Paseo models, the readiness flag for the EVAP monitor will never set, and no dealer fix is yet available. Other vehicles that often have a "not ready" condition for the EVAP and catalytic converter monitors include 1996-?98 Volvos, 1996-?98 Saabs, and 1996-?97 Nissan 2.0L 200SX models.
My M5 had a recall because the state testing equipment could not communicate, BMW had to reflash the ecu to come into line with state testing equipment.