ptschram said:
These people work for us. We have a duty and obligation to demand that they treat us all like the citizens that we are, not the scum of the earth that too many cops see their citizenry as.
Who told you that? Incorrect. They work for the state, and they uphold the interests of the state, including its various diktats. If, for example, in a routine situation your propery is protected, it is not because the mission is to protect your property, but rather because it is in the interests of the state to protect your property in order to preserve order (and the state).
The same folks who are against socialized health care often line up in favor of socialized protection.
Socialized protection - what we euphemistically call "policing" - is a complete failure. It fails for the same reasons as socialized medicine:
- Misallocation of resources
- Bureaucracy above efficacy
- rationing
One of the most fundamental ploys of the state is to disarm the people and make self defense a crime. In the United States we are half way to the former and most of the way to the later.
Once the people are largely disarmed and disincented, if not outright prohibited from defending themselves, the state will then create a permanent, full-time police force to provide for your defense. Bureaucracies and taxes will be then be expanded to support such a force. Over time, the force will be expanded to include various specialist divisions – drugs, traffic, undercover secret police, etc – and bureaucracies will expand and overlap accordingly – federal, state, county and local – until the people suffer a vast web of agencies each in charge of policing the same group: the people. Fortunately for the agents of the state, its various bodies will be busy legislating and regulating away the people’s liberties and creating new ‘crimes’ against which they might then police.
Career crime is largely created by the failures of socialized protection. If individuals were responsible for their own protection, those who would otherwise practice crime as a career and/or be incarcerated at your expense would quickly be killed or seriously wounded while attempted to rob/batter/rape/kill a private citizen. Careers in crime would therefore be extremely dangerous and often quite short.
Instead, we have socialized protection - a protection racket run by the government largely to enforce its own laws of confiscation ("taxation") against citizens and defend its own monopolies in certain enterprises. Thus is the "black market" in commerce created, and thus are career criminals sustained indefinitely at your expense.
How does all this relate to the Gates situation? We, as a society, have accepted that disrespecting an "officer" is a crime worthy of being handcuffed and arrested. Again, a slippery slope. Let's hope it's not the ATF at your door some day.
Edit: none of this should be confused as my questioning the fact that Gates is a jackass. He is. But we cannot permit jackassery to be a crime. Also, for the record, Obama was a jackass for commenting on it as de facto POTUS. Bad call.