...even though almost no manufacturer requires such an aggressive oil-change schedule.
That's not exactly a surprise.
"Drivers have a number of ways to reduce the environmental impact of their vehicles, which can also save them money,"
It's going to sell one way or another, jackass. A good amount of it ends up being recycled, anyway.
It made sense years ago, when "we had cast-iron block engines with cast-iron pistons that would expand when they got hot and older lubricants,"
Really? Perhaps he should have a look at the thermal expansion figures of the two metals. Kirk to driver: "And double dumb-ass on you!"
"Our new generation of engines have tighter internal tolerances, which reduces the amount of carbon and other products from combustion that gets into the oil,"
The agency and other groups said slashing motor-oil consumption would be good for the environment and won't hurt the longevity or reliability of autos.
Yeah... That's always been a bullshit excuse, and it's always been less than accurate.
I'm having a laugh. The glass tops on their electric ranges are probably more shit up than my valves will ever be, and I'm talking about a 4.0 RV8, here. I wonder how much carbon is gumming up their engines?
It's about how important your engine is to you, not how important it is to some jackass that spent too much time in college and not enough time doing things where a solid engine is important.
If your only car is under warranty, covered by AAA, is washed in one of those automatic things, and you find driving a thousand miles is a hassle, you've got no business telling me how often I need to change my oil.
Cheers,
Kennith