If I can make the jag blower and intercoolers fit with a customized lower plenum / intake... I make just make a few and sell em.
Hey. It’s my thread. you can take it anywhere you like. So you do all that work and you still have the horsepower restrictor plates LR calls heads to deal with. Then the intake and now headers and a new Y Pipe. All things you would change out with a LS swap. Sorry. I’ll stop now. But to stay on topic , I think that would be really cool if you can work out the blower thing.If I had the budget, I'd be very interested to see if Darton sleeves could be used to poke the displacement and use ~3.8 buick pistons and a buick 350 crank... I am guessing some significant rod clearance issues would need to be dealt with. This would require the 3.9/4.2 block though..which of course is sans cross-bolts. If using the 4/4.6 then I am guessing a lot crank work would be required to make it all fit. I have not seen them all in a room together so... I just dunno. I reached out to D&D but have not heard back.
*Man, I have seriously failed to help keep this Preferable Clutch Brands post on track! I will end my non-related discussion here.
Is that for the straight 6 motor? Maybe a centrifugal blower would be the ticket. Not sure an intercooler would be necessary at low boost. I know it’s always better to have one than not, but you could get away with it at 4 or 5 psi. That would be really cool. If I am missing the point that you want it to be an “ all English” theme, then just let me know. Lolre: Jag blower
This is the one I am eyeballin (not this physical one, but.. you get it): https://www.ebay.com/itm/235277191082
I have no idea if that snout clears the alternator, distributor, etc... but it's a start. Clearly the inlet will need some customization for the throttle body, MAF, airbox, etc. But the intercoolers look cool View attachment 65770
Nope. They are useless at low RPM.. unless you put a *tiny* pulley on it and spin the everloving snot out of it. I don't see that as feasible. twin, very small turbos would be a more effective solution for this low RPM, low boost bar top beauty.Maybe a centrifugal blower
Intercoolers help even at boost levels in the 5psi range. I imagine they do at lower squeeze but there is certainly a diminishing effect...which crosses over into negative "help" territory at low and off-boost levels, because of the increased pressure drop (inlet air resistance) that come with blowing and sucking air through a radiator and all that inlet plumbing.Not sure an intercooler would be necessary at low boost. I know it’s always better to have one than not, but you could get away with it at 4 or 5 psi.
Land Rover 5.0HO Land Rover 5.0HO engine, 320HP 340 FTLBS torque. Looking for tire smoking power for your Land Rover? We start with a base Land Rover block stroke it, stuff in a 300 crank, longer connecting rods, larger pistons, 300 heads, matched fuel injectors, blue printed , balanced, ported and polished. Engine is complette and set up for direct bolt in. Please contact us with any questions. $6,495.95 LR5OHO3 |
It turns out there's a cast (twin) turbo manifold made by Boost Performance:
Do they have a current website?just ordered a pair last week
Wow, nice. The 0.20 over is what I'd like to talk about. Have you looked into those new Dalton interlocking sleeves (MID) that require **MAJOR** machining to the block? I don't know if it's even feasible but.. it looks pretty awesome ( https://dartonsleeves.com/tech-publications/mid-information/ ).
I just got off the phone with the guy at D&D. He appears to have a LOT of experience building these engines. He essentially said: build a 4.6 shortblock and bolt your (if late/compatible INTERIM) 3.9 heads, front & back fiddlybits on it.. with a "stage 2" cam and call it a day.
He said the 300 crank idea was born out of the 80's era when there was no 4.6. He said the same guy that attempted to make the 300 crank fit into the 3.9 block also tried the 350 crank..with no success on either attempt.
He also did not recommend the blower (at least at ~7-10psi) either because I'd be hard pressed to keep the gaskets from lifting/failing. Though he did mention some fancy gaskets that may help.. so I'll look into that (I am quite familiar with o-ring'd gaskets and that is not what he mentioned).
Regarding hydraulic roller cams.. he said it will be very difficult finding blanks and harder to find the right profiles for the application (low rpm, boosted). While that may be true, that does not mean it's not possible. That said, I will likely go with a slightly beefed up "stage 2" cam as he suggested. Again, I am trying to make low end power, not high rpm breathing. ...so that needs some more thought.
I have had 9 flat tappet cam and lifter failures in the last 4 years. After the second cam and 3 sets of lifters and 4 iterations of rocker setups i gave up on a flat tappet cam in annabelle. I just want her to run reliably and the only way i saw it going was to go full roller engine. So i went on a mission. I got a roller 215 billit and after 8 machine shops i found one that said "Send it to me!" after months and months he had the nose cut to match the short nose and did a custom grind on it for mid range power 2000-5000rpm. Nothing crazy on the grind but as aggressive as he could within that rpm range. I just asked him last week if he could replicate it and now that he knows what to do the answer is yes. it surpised me on the price too. much cheaper than i was expecting. yesterday i fit my rockers and was able to get a pushrod measurement. Called Manton pushrods and have a set being made. I cant wait to get them and have her running. i have been fighting this cam issue for almost 2 years now.Wow, nice. The 0.20 over is what I'd like to talk about. Have you looked into those new Dalton interlocking sleeves (MID) that require **MAJOR** machining to the block? I don't know if it's even feasible but.. it looks pretty awesome ( https://dartonsleeves.com/tech-publications/mid-information/ ).
I just got off the phone with the guy at D&D. He appears to have a LOT of experience building these engines. He essentially said: build a 4.6 shortblock and bolt your (if late/compatible INTERIM) 3.9 heads, front & back fiddlybits on it.. with a "stage 2" cam and call it a day.
He said the 300 crank idea was born out of the 80's era when there was no 4.6. He said the same guy that attempted to make the 300 crank fit into the 3.9 block also tried the 350 crank..with no success on either attempt.
He also did not recommend the blower (at least at ~7-10psi) either because I'd be hard pressed to keep the gaskets from lifting/failing. Though he did mention some fancy gaskets that may help.. so I'll look into that (I am quite familiar with o-ring'd gaskets and that is not what he mentioned).
Regarding hydraulic roller cams.. he said it will be very difficult finding blanks and harder to find the right profiles for the application (low rpm, boosted). While that may be true, that does not mean it's not possible. That said, I will likely go with a slightly beefed up "stage 2" cam as he suggested. Again, I am trying to make low end power, not high rpm breathing. ...so that needs some more thought.