Are those 255/85 in the linked picture? They look bigger than 235/85.
Nope. That picture is Trxus MT(Pieces of shit) 235/85 and OME 2" and a pile of armor. Tucked perfectly. It was a killer setup.
http://www.discoweb.org/briandickens/poser2.jpg
I went 255/85 and had a snowball, as you would say. The project did not end until I sold it.
I listened to the guys here and built it up. Peops on the board help me setup the diffs/lockers and so on. Pretty fun, but no longer have the time. You'll be lucky if you get that kind of assistance these days.
The more you invest, the more you will need to spend keeping it up.... if you really use it.
Read what we say and take it for what it is worth. YMMV. If you are lucky enough to get candid advice from some "old timers", you can almost take it as gospel... of course ignore chapmen, LOL.
I agree with the others... on the 3.54 gear thing. I ran my stock ratio with 255/85.. Just had to get into 4500/5000 in the mountains, but my engine was never an issue. I ran a ton of tough trails. I did blow one diff, but the drive shaft, was likely the culprit (along with my stupidity).
Think about the trails that you want to run and how easy they will be looking "stealth" vs huge. 255/85 will run some of the most difficult trails in N.A. if done right. Unless you WANT to run them don't build your disco to do them. My gallery lists the minor stuff I had at the time. Pretty simple.
NATO wheels -- 235/85-16 Interco Trxus M/Ts
Castor Alloys -- 245/75-16 BFG ATs
OME HD Springs & Shocks
Superwinch X9
Rockware front and rear Bumpers
Rockware front and rear skidplates
Rockware sliders
Rockware catalytic converter skidplate
Antisways removed
The driveway pictures are 245/75. I liked the 235/85 better, those are the poser pics from Wheeler Lake.