The Hammonds at their sentencing argued that the 5 years was too harsh, and the judge agreed and gave them months (how many judges have given less than manditory minimum sentences for minor drug offenders?). The prosecution appealed and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (a very liberal group) agreed and ordered the 5 years.
It's not double jeopardy - the were convicted, but their sentence was changed.
I've read more than one story about how they ended up with longer sentences and do not necessarily disagree with them receiving more than a few months.
They are planning another appeal, they won't be in another 5 years.
You obviously wanted to discuss this and have formed some pretty strong opinions on it.
I think that there are land issues. I think that these are extremist Mormons and that does not help their cause. I think that the locals don't want them there, so even if they have a legitimate concern, it's going to be tough.
I am certainly not going to grab some guns and go help extremist Mormons, that would be a tough choice even if they were correct.