S
Swa j-Ten said:no, I'm pretty sure it was a violent affair - probably very magnificent if someone might have had the fortune of witnessing it.
I believe, after all, that it happened in seven days.
Jupiter Rover said:im just typing, im not trying to write a formal research paper. and leslie,, alot of your ideas about glaciers and old lakes get ruled out by a world wide flood. this argument could go on forever. we both have our own facts. we just believe two different things.
Swa j-Ten said:(Re-post)
ALRIGHT, ALRIGHT - I did a little research:
The deepest hole ever drilled was on the Kola Peninsula in the USSR (1970). They reached a depth of 7.6 miles and found rocks they CLAIMED to be 2.7 billion years old (all from Wikipedia).
Now, if you convert 7.6 miles to inches and divide 481,536 inches by 2,700,000,000 years, you get 0.000178 inches per year.
Do you mean to tell me, Leslie, that they dug for 7.6 miles and counted 2.7 billion individual 0.000178-inch thick layers?
there are no virtual facts to support either theories.. the only 100% way to know, is if someone was alive the day the earth was created and had a eye witnessreport. or a "snapshot" lol.. but there is Alot of evidence that goes against an ancient earth. that only pushes towards "young earth"gil stevens said:and your "factual" information to support that?
in chance? or a creator?Swa j-Ten said:Believing all that all takes a LOT more faith than believing in a finite amount of matter, and a Creator.