I will answer your original question again. Since you did not get it the first time.
"Why is it accepted that people should be allowed smoke breaks at work, but you cannot have a shot at work. "
You can have a shot at work. Go for it. You can have a smoke at work too, just do it. But if there is something written in an employee hand book about either, then don't blame me if you get your ass fired.
The reason that many companies do not allow drinking at work is due to the liability of "allowing" people to get drunk. If someone were to drink at work and their work promoted this, then the company might be held liable for their actions. Since actions are impaired by drinking, the employer would rather make it against the rules in order to avoid liability. In some work places, being drunk could be putting yourself and others lives on the line. Even slight impairment.
The differences between being "impaired" by alcohol vs nicotine are obviously different and most people and employers recognize this. Since I believe that even you understand the differences as well, its a lame argument.
Please point me where nicotine impairment includes these:
--Impairment of perception, memory and comprehension
--Decreased sensitory response; increased reaction time
--Increased self-confidence; decreased inhibitions
--Sensory-motor incoordination; impaired balance
There are a lot of things that people can be addicted to, but I am am not aware of any addictions that will get you extra benefits in the workplace.
PS: I no longer smoke or drink.
"Why is it accepted that people should be allowed smoke breaks at work, but you cannot have a shot at work. "
You can have a shot at work. Go for it. You can have a smoke at work too, just do it. But if there is something written in an employee hand book about either, then don't blame me if you get your ass fired.
The reason that many companies do not allow drinking at work is due to the liability of "allowing" people to get drunk. If someone were to drink at work and their work promoted this, then the company might be held liable for their actions. Since actions are impaired by drinking, the employer would rather make it against the rules in order to avoid liability. In some work places, being drunk could be putting yourself and others lives on the line. Even slight impairment.
The differences between being "impaired" by alcohol vs nicotine are obviously different and most people and employers recognize this. Since I believe that even you understand the differences as well, its a lame argument.
Please point me where nicotine impairment includes these:
--Impairment of perception, memory and comprehension
--Decreased sensitory response; increased reaction time
--Increased self-confidence; decreased inhibitions
--Sensory-motor incoordination; impaired balance
There are a lot of things that people can be addicted to, but I am am not aware of any addictions that will get you extra benefits in the workplace.
PS: I no longer smoke or drink.