bri said:
Just "rat" on them. Tell HR and facilities. Likely that would fix it better than face to face confrontation.
Seriously?
You must be the biggest buzz kill of the company. "Lets tell on them behind their backs--tee hee heee."
You dont need to go kicking people in the shins and spitting at them in a face to face 'confrontation.' There is the sane, middle ground of having a chat with someone, where you politely express that their action is not appreciated. If that does not work, THEN you take it up with managers/HR. God, talk about going for the nuclear option at stage one.
BTW, I know it sounds like its directed right at you. But this was not. Just trying to put the idea of a nice conversation out there, since a lot of us would normally overlook it as a possibility.
The argument that because 'smokers' get a break 'drinkers' should to, is false. Just because one thing is bad, does not make another one alright.
The reason smoking is tolerated, is it makes TONS of money for the US while NOT created a dangerous workplace--sadly, alcohol would make MORE money but also create MORE risks. I say this while personally supporting the 2 shot a day limit at work.
Drinks should not be allowed at work, but in the same token, smoking should not be allowed at work either. They are both bad for different reasons in a workplace. Problem solved
atriot: