JamesWyatt said:
David, Agro and I both were IP banned. I don't know if any others were or not. [...]
Sadly, I stand corrected. My apologies.
JamesWyatt said:
And, if Kyle were not (hopefully) so busy welding away [...]
Uh, right. Or maybe he is? I would have thought that he'd have the sense to follow through and mail me the 8 brackets he owed me when he promised that I would receive them "by week's end" almost three weeks ago, but he didn't. And who could be easier to please than me at this point? 8 brackets which should just be sitting around in his shop, waiting for him to spend the 10 minutes to bag them up and ship. Would have looked pretty good for me to come back here and say "I got my brackets, he's trying, folks."
JamesWyatt said:
I don't have anything else of value to contribute to this conversation, except to reiterate that if Kyle shows up again and you call him on his behavior you might very well get banned too.
Now there's an interesting tidbit. That would be unfortunate, but this point, I have to say I'd shed remarkably few tears.
Axel, as you know, I have no personal reason to be critical of you, and in fact have measurable reason to believe you are truly trying to do what's right by everyone. So I hope you'll take this in the genuinely friendly sense that is intended:
You're judged by the friends you keep. "You" in this case is Dweb (not Axel), and the key word is "keep".
That's not the same as 'guilt by association'. If Ho kills someone (to use curtis' analogy), assuming John is an accessory is wrong. But once the verdict is in, if John then comes back and says "I heard that guy mouthed off to Ho real bad, so piss off", while he's still not an accomplice, we'd be stupid not to draw a few conclusions about John's judgement.
What I mean is:
Axel said:
agro1 said:
I'm not saying you (or Ho) have any responsibility for what Kyle does. What I am saying is that it makes DWeb look bad when one of the owners stiffs people in the Land Rover community, and then comes here and bans people for criticizing him.
Now, that is different from what you have said earlier. This statement actually holds some merit, which is why it is important to realize that Dweb and RS is not one and the same.
Technically true, Dweb and RS are not 'one and the same'. I'll take it a step further: Axel is not Dweb and Ho is not Dweb (probably to lesser degrees of "is not", but at least, Axel and Ho help make Dweb. Dweb doesn't make Axel and Ho).
But RoverSolutions
is Kyle, and Kyle
is a Dweb admin, and for the rest of us here, that means that Kyle is 1/3 of Dweb. So while Axel and Ho may not have anything to do with Kyle or the crap he's pulling, Kyle and his business
do have a lot to do with Dweb.
Those of us who are pissed at Kyle will naturally look to the other 2/3 of Dweb and wonder what they think about it. Letting him run people around like agro1 and James describe doesn't help.
(This doesn't help either:
$ host
www.roversolutions.com
www.roversolutions.com has address 204.157.1.4
$ host
www.discoweb.org
www.discoweb.org has address 204.157.1.3
Now, all that means is that Kyle set up both servers and they are both hosted in the same place, and it's all been discussed before; probably also means that giving Kyle the boot would take Axel and Ho some significant effort. But again, it doesn't help.)
And eventually,
not changing an association with someone who is jerking people around, both in business and here on Dweb, will itself be seen as a kind of approval, fair or not.
Has that time come and is that what I think of Axel and Ho? Hardly. I still respect you both, and I'm sure the whole topic annoys the hell out of both of you. But I'm more patient than many people. I'm just saying that if you're wondering why some folks are scowling in the general direction of Dweb, that's why, and even though you haven't personally done anything wrong and you would never act like Kyle has, you can't really tell them they've got no reason at all.
Taking the above in mind, I do have to agree with Agro1: Kyle's ban-happy reaction to the criticism does undeniably reflect poorly on Dweb.