ptschram said:
No, I do not daily drive any trucks made after 1996, my wife does though.
I do however, have experience with the very first camshaft that Mark modified, Gary bought it and hasn't had a problem.
Bruce Crower told me the cam profile would keep it from walking.
Maybe you could find someone to grind the groove for you if you think it's so important.
At the risk of attracting the attention and disdain of Mike Rupp, do we really care if the cam makes a slight noise? We bought a high-performance camshaft to make an engine do things it wasn't necessarily supposed to do, maybe, just maybe a little noise is an acceptable compromise.
I'm still waiting for you to disagree with me about the pushrods. In more than 40 years of wrenching, I've never seen the need to replace a pushrod without evidence of damage. Maybe you just drank the Kool-Aid of whoever was selling you parts you didn't need.
Mark gave me the same horseshit story about how the cam would not walk because it's constantly being screwed towards the rear of the engine. It's horseshit. His cams walk. They make noise. It's annoying as shit. It like having a collector gasket leaking.
Mark will, for an additional charge, make it so a thrust plate can be used. I find that to be bullshit. Why not just do it right in the first place? In this instance, where the OP was talking about using a 4.6 cam, I don't see any need for him to look at mark's 230 cam. The 4.6 cam is probably cheaper, it's made to fit, and he would not need the mandatory D&D timing set with the timing ring built in.
If this guy was wanting a "high-performance", as you put it, type cam, such as the 258 or larger, then sure, mark's cams might be a good thing. But I would still have it machined to accept a thrust washer. Why the fuck would I want to put another engine together knowing it's going to knock at idle? That would be like not installing the oil pan gasket on purpose because I know the engine is going to leak oil sooner or later anyway.
As for you push rod story. Push rods wear. That's why it says to put the push rods back exactly from where they came from in your Haynes Manuel post above. If you put a push rod from cylinder 8 in cylinders 1 position, the wear patterns on the rockers/push rods may not mate. That's because the rods have worn. Sometimes this will make a tick in the engine, other times it will not. But why fuck around at all? It's $100; I put that much in the fuel tank last week. It's not like these are $1,000. It's $100. For $100 I'll pay for the peace of mind. The same thing could be said about head-bolts. Some people have had good luck reusing head-bolts. Not me! Why would you even risk it? It's $90, just buy new ones.
If you are reusing push rods you're a hack. You may as well reuse the spark plugs, oil filter, main seals, and valve cover gaskets, too.
Shit, remind me to never buy a set of reconditioned cylinder heads from you. It's hard to tell what kind of corners you cut there.